|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
What Would You Rather Have?
What would you rather have?
1988 Fleer Sticker Michael Jordan PSA 10 Auction ending price: $25,600 http://www.ebay.com/itm/142054468958 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth #149 SGC 84 Auction ending price: $24,098 http://www.ebay.com/itm/401148338576 Last edited by 4815162342; 07-30-2016 at 09:12 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Ruth, all day and every day. regardless of future projected value or wtvr.
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away."- Tom Waits |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I'd rather have the cash! I can't imagine spending $25K on ANY card.
__________________
I Remember Now. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
The Ruth 10-10 times...
Way too many 88 Jordan stickers and rookies for that matter. Jordan's will always have value.. But the Ruth is iconic and could be one of those cards that makes the meteoric jump in the coming years. Having said that..... I'll take the 25k in cash! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How is that Jordan a PSA 10 with that centering?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
A vote for externalizing items normally found within the mouth
The Jordan, as Ruth is not showing any tongue.
Brian |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
That's insane for a sticker, especially one years after any of his rookie cards. If I wasn't considering value of the sticker to resell for other cards, I'd rather have a grade 1 goudey ruth than the sticker any day of the week!
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Not even a close. The Ruth all day long. Besides, how is that Jordan a 10 with that centering?
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The fact that a grader gave that a 10 absolutely shows a PSA grading scale is garbage. I would not pay more than a 35 bucks for that card personally outside that case and then feel hesitant as this Jordan bubble looks to me like a balloon racing into a razor warehouse. That someone paid 25k for a 10 on a plastic slab holding an 8 is madness. Who are these people throwing money away on a junk wax sticker!? This was a sub 10 dollar card a year ago unslabbed, how can this be a logical use of one's money? I am just mind blown.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 07-31-2016 at 08:01 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
+1
__________________
. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson “If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Ruth
__________________
Successful transactions with: Drumback, Mart8081, Obcmac, Tonyo, markf31, gnaz01, rainier2004, EASE, Bobsbats, Craig M, TistaT202, Seiklis, Kenny Cole, T's please, Vic, marcdelpercio, poorlydrawncat, brianp-beme, mybuddyinc, Glchen, chernieto , old-baseball , Donscards, Centauri, AddieJoss, T2069bk,206fix, joe v, smokelessjoe, eggoman, botn, canjond Looking for T205's or anything Babe Ruth...email or PM me if you have any to sell. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The money.
However, in the spirit of the question----The Babe. Beautiful card. With the younger age of the new deep pocket big spender collectors however, most of them are going to gravitate to Michael Jordan, especially if they see other fellow young guns buying MJ. JMHO ---Brian Powell |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I would rather have:
Ruth to own. The Jordan to sell.
__________________
Personal Collection Magic Number: 29 Collecting Hall of Famers and players with Nebraska connections. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
The Ruth.
Is it just me or does the bottom left of the Jordan corner have a white "dot" on it? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
babe ruth
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
The $$$$$
That much money......... no offense but screw those cards.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I love it when I have no idea my collection has increased 100 fold in value. First it was the Jordan rookie and sticker. Now an 88 sticker. I think I paid a couple hundred in 2000? 2001? Stupid prices but maybe its time to sell my Jordan collection.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Crazy stuff these days. I am going with the little sticker over a period and great looking Ruth.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I wouldn't bid on either. The Jordan's l/r centering would gnaw at me at that level, and so would the blurriness around Babe's cap, hands, and bat.
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Now to get that much boo coo to spend .... ---Brian Powell |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=4815162342;1566987]What would you rather have?
The Jordan so I can stick it on my bathroom mirror! ----Montgomery Brewster---- . |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
As a collector of the pre-shine era, the Ruth is an easy choice. As to appreciation potential, I continue to believe it's a crapshoot.
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Your last sentiment is so true. With what we have seen lately "anything is possible" is the only correct answer.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Best of luck on that, Larry |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I'll take Ruth easily.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
.
Last edited by begsu1013; 08-22-2016 at 11:03 PM. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Perhaps that is true, Bob, but I am leery of dumping a large sum of money into any card with hundreds of thousands of raw examples that could easily erode its value with newly slabbed specimens...and you know that this result will spawn a rush of submittals to PSA of the 1988 stickers. The Ruth is a classic card from a classic set that is not likely to see a pop increase.
Personally, I'd not buy either card. I've always believed in buying rarity, not slabs. The Jordan is common; the Ruth is tougher but still a widely available mainstream card. I'd rather have a nice midgrade Ruth that presents well and spend the other $20,000+ on other cards.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 08-13-2016 at 08:01 AM. |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Odd
Odd that members of a pre-WW2 baseball card message board would chose a pre-WW2 baseball card over a post-WW2 basketball card...
Would you guys prefer a Baltimore News Ruth or a comparably valued copy of Superman #1?😐 |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Most definitely Ruth
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The point of this thread was not really to poll the board for their preference, but to point out something ridiculous. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Dunno about you guys...but I'd much rather have one of the highest graded gretzky rookie cards as opposed to collector graded cards of the following:
t206 plank run of practically every period ruth card ever made mantle rookies(both) gehrig rookie ramly wajo cj cobb t206 hof run cj hof run(14 and 15) shall I keep going? |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
A better comparison would be a Low Grade 1939 Superman #2 or a High Grade 2003 Walking Dead #1. They go for about the same price and compare two separate eras of the same hobby. FWIW I would take the #2 Superman.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums Last edited by bn2cardz; 08-14-2016 at 10:39 AM. |
|
|