![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Took me a little while to post as I was at the national, but here's what my BVG and PSA (new) slabs look like post breaking! BVG there is no way those things are being resealed haha and the new PSA slabs show a little frosting, but nothing terrible (pardon the crappy cell phone pics... No scanner!)
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BVG slab 2... Okay for some reason the photos keep failing when I try to upload now, but the PSA one you can tell around the inside "card placeholders" it was popped due to frosting on the ends. Maybe where it was "sonically" sealed??
Last edited by deeg23; 08-08-2016 at 07:40 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's interesting that if the HOF gets a donation of a graded card, they will bust it out. They don't trust any slabs for "archival" purposes. Meaning not that any slabs are inherently bad, there's just no way to tell how they will decompose over the next 100+ years.
![]()
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The PSA/SGC/BVG/BGS debate has happened over and over again, but the gist of the reason that BGS/BVG sells for less is:
1) People aren't competing their registry sets there. (SGC gets bit here as well.) 2) People don't trust BVG to detect trimming, since they will grade sheet-cut cards (like O-Pee-Chees Gretzy rookies with all straight cuts) and cards shorter than spec (1993 SP Jeter). 3) First mover advantage by PSA. 4) PSA's bulk submission pricing. 5) Higher PSA realized pricing begets more submissions to PSA.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi all - new to Net54 so apologies if this has been addressed elsewhere. Collector since childhood but new to the whole graded card game. I've noticed some of my PSA slabs, both on new and old holders, getting what looks like some plastic particles or abrasion in that space between the PAS label and card. Attached pic here that hopefully gives this some context. Has anyone else experienced this, and if so, anything that can be done outside of getting re-holdered?
Thank you! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rather than using clippers, I thought about using a Dremel tool to break open some of my slabs. I would have it held steady in a vice while I cut. Has anyone else used a Dremel to separate a slab?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Picture didn't upload properly. Try again or host it somewhere else and then put the link here.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My PSA Damage Tale | KingFisk | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 08-05-2016 03:07 AM |
Advice... To Slab or Not to Slab? | lampertb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-21-2015 08:03 AM |
T206 - Sun damage? | bigwinnerx | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 07-31-2014 10:04 AM |
To Slab Or Not To Slab That Is The Question | MacDice | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 01-25-2011 05:32 PM |
D304 Cobb with back damage on ebay -- back damage not shown | calvindog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-26-2010 05:51 PM |