![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1909 - Series one - known as the "150" series 1910 - Series two - known as the "350" series 1911 - Series three - known as the "350-460" or to some collectors, the "460" series Not all the same T206s were printed from series to series. Some players did carry over into other series, while new versions of a player's cards were added into the next year's series. This is why some players have multiple cards (portrait or action version) in the three year print run. Other players were cut from production altogether after the first year. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who was best man at John McGraw's wedding?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How many women have married more than one Heisman Trophy winner?
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My question above regarding E97 Briggs is something I am truly curious about. In most cases, the black and whites have a few copies of the same player, and I can't see any change from one to the other, like you would expect with proofs. They look to me like black and white versions of E97s with a blank back, not "proofs." Are they really proofs, and if not, why are they called proofs?
__________________
Ed Collecting PCL, Southern Association, and type cards. http://hangingjudgesports.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So if nothing else, tradition holds strong. I have been trying to debunk the 'generic' label for the majority of the cards in the E91 sets for years, but sometimes old labels have a way of clinging, just like a joey inside Momma Kangaroo's pouch. Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 07-13-2016 at 07:04 PM. Reason: Kangaroo just took possession of the pouch |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, dumb question for the day (posed to me many times over the years by non-believers):
Why do grown men collect baseball cards? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
...they're easier to hide from the wife , unlike my 1950's run of Playboy. ... |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
- Love the game basebal, - Have the "collector" gene in our body, - Enjoy reliving the good times of our youth, and - Need/want a healthy escape from the trials & tribulations of everyday life. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the exact reasoning behind something being considered an XRC (or even an unofficial RC) vs a regular RC? I understand that a regional issue might not qualify, but I also see national issues that don't qualify as well. For example, Pee Wee Reese is in both the 1941 Play Ball and 1941 Double Play sets. The Play Ball is considered the only "official" rookie, while the Double Play is an "extra" rookie card. As far as I know, both sets were nationally available, and the Double Play set is a bigger set by number of cards.
__________________
Actively bouncing aimlessly from set to set trying to accomplish something, but getting nowhere Last edited by PowderedH2O; 07-14-2016 at 08:57 AM. Reason: grammar |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Because it's cheaper and more enjoyable than collecting wives.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
probably a stupid question regarding psa/dna | milkit1 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 07-21-2013 06:13 PM |
Stupid question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-05-2007 01:57 PM |
stupid question #44 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-07-2006 05:52 AM |
I don't usually post stupid auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2006 02:07 PM |
Using my stupid post allowance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-25-2002 05:51 PM |