![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
We are not talking a 2 to a 3, or even a 4, and I am no where near being a grader but I am 99% sure I can tell the difference between a 2 and a 7. Like you mentioned, mistakes happen but I would also bet, aside from Exhibitman's example, there are many more out there that have also been grossly mis-graded. Things wouldn't look so suspect if PSA admitted they screwed up and regraded the card for free but recharging the submitter for their glaring mistake certainly makes one question their integrity.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I also believe that a grade above 10 is coming. The off-center PSA 10 '53 Mays from the other thread proves that PSA has left some room above Gem Mint. SGC and BGS already have a Pristine grade, so I'm sure they'll follow suit at some point. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is called a mistake. People make them everyday. i can only assume not seeing the card it was ether a data entry error or someone missed something the second time around, or thought the saw something that wasn't really there the first time. Like i said the grading is done by human beings and we make mistakes.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A little off topic but does anyone else collect grading errors? Here are a couple pictures of mine.
The PSA errors left to right are Counterfeit, Black Box version not whited out, and completely wrong card. Second picture left to right are highly altered, No F scribble not Loop scribble, and wrong year. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Anyone found a fake 1963 Rose rookie that ended up being graded by PSA?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
When I first read his story, I couldn't help but think there is a 2 graded card out there sporting a 7?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 07-10-2016 at 06:31 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
imagine having the best 10....they would have to keep a database of their 10s i guess to compare ...thus the best 10 will always be POP 1 but you could lose the designation if a better example comes along and you could verify which cert number is the best 10 but checking psa website with the cert lookup Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 07-10-2016 at 06:34 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do grading companies punish for printing errors? | Louieman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-12-2014 10:35 AM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
Looking for double names, miscuts, printing errors, proofs, ghost, errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 08-19-2008 03:03 PM |
GAI Grading errors/problems | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-22-2006 10:48 AM |