First time I’ve been ripped off

[khkco4bls]

Oh boo hoo like I'm supposed to feel bad about a guy that waited for months to send the item how many times do we have to go through this that he'll get his money back so stop the nonsense

[4815162342]

Originally Posted by khkco4bls

Oh boo hoo like I'm supposed to feel bad about a guy that waited for months to send the item how many times do we have to go through this that he'll get his money back so stop the nonsense

You do realize that you're insulting and ticking off pretty much all of the potential bidders of your REA lots, don't you?

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Originally Posted by 4815162342

You do realize that you're insulting and ticking off pretty much all of the potential bidders of your REA lots, don't you?

Well, I doubt that's actually gong to have any impact on anything. I for one would bid on anything I wanted. Of course if HE was handling the sale that would be a different story.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by 4815162342

You do realize that you're insulting and ticking off pretty much all of the potential bidders of your REA lots, don't you?

I highly doubt it will have any affect on bidding. It has been proven over and over that people will buy cards from complete scum. If Bill Mastro had a cheap PSA graded T206 HOFer for sale people would line up to buy/bid on it.

[packs]

If it's only a $40 baseball and you owe him $600, why are you demanding the ball back first?

[Mdmtx]

Kevin,
I don't know you, and I feel fortunate I don't. You misrepresented an item. If proven to be intentional, that could be construed as fraud. Your unwillingness to make this an easy transaction is also confounding. So you need the 30 dollar ball back before you refund the $600 you charged? That seems a little ridiculous. Refund him $570 now and hold back $30 until you get your ball back. Your complaint of 4 months time passing is weak as well. Aren't you lucky it took him 4 months to figure out he had purchased something that was misrepresented, you got an interest free loan for 4 months. I think if you reread this thread you will do the right thing, cause the thread is anything but flattering for your image.


Mark Medlin

[jb217676]

Wow, some seriously bad mojo here. What a way to alienate potential customers, many of whom call this site home.
Jeff Betts

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Originally Posted by jb217676

Wow, some seriously bad mojo here. What a way to alienate potential customers, many of whom call this site home.
Jeff Betts

Guys he said he's liquidating his collection. Basically he doesn't care about repercussions because he's never making another deal. That's also why booting him (at his request) is also meaningless.

[Tigerden]

Based on Kevin's last post looks like Jonathan is not getting his refund. Agreed, no repercussions for Kevin as he admits he is liquidating his collection. Kevin appears to have had zero desire giving a dime of the money back all along. One hurdle after another for Jonathan as the goalposts keeps being moved. Kevin found a new collector and sold him the stuff REA would not take. I just hope Jonathan learned from this experience and knows Kevin is the exception rather than the rule on this site. Hopefully you will continue to collect not be discouraged and recognize this is a great forum and a great source for knowledge about this hobby.

Adam Blaney

[gemmint77]

Keeping track of names so I don't get screwed!!

[vintagebb2014]

+1

[TheNightmanCometh]

Can we ban Kevin now?

[vintagetoppsguy]

I didn't want to post this until Jonathan received his refund, but PayPal WOULD NOT have refunded his money. This was a combined purchase payment and PayPal does not make seller's issue partial refunds. PayPal can make the seller refund the entire purchase if the entire purchase is returned by the buyer (which in this case wasn't possible), but sellers do not have to give partial refunds. I'm glad this worked out for Jonathan.

[EvilKing00]

Originally Posted by Mdmtx

Kevin,
I don't know you, and I feel fortunate I don't. You misrepresented an item. If proven to be intentional, that could be construed as fraud. Your unwillingness to make this an easy transaction is also confounding. So you need the 30 dollar ball back before you refund the $600 you charged? That seems a little ridiculous. Refund him $570 now and hold back $30 until you get your ball back. Your complaint of 4 months time passing is weak as well. Aren't you lucky it took him 4 months to figure out he had purchased something that was misrepresented, you got an interest free loan for 4 months. I think if you reread this thread you will do the right thing, cause the thread is anything but flattering for your image.


Mark Medlin

Well said

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by bnorth

I highly doubt it will have any affect on bidding. It has been proven over and over that people will buy cards from complete scum (insert Probstein's name here). If Bill Mastro had a cheap PSA graded T206 HOFer for sale people would line up to buy/bid on it.

Yup. Sad. True, but sad.

[khkco4bls]

So I gotta sit here and listen to you vindictive people constantly. I told you I would refund his money what is the problem here. I have never had a problem dealing with anybody on here selling items he's gonna get his money but this is why people run from this site cuz they just can't stand all you people that live in such a perfect world. Time to move on people

[Mdmtx]

So the guy that ultimately had to go to the court of public opinion and the subjects of that court are vindictive? Wow. That's rich.

[Laxcat]

Every time this thread pops up, this is what I picture in my mind.

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by khkco4bls

So I gotta sit here and listen to you vindictive people constantly. I told you I would refund his money what is the problem here. I have never had a problem dealing with anybody on here selling items he's gonna get his money but this is why people run from this site cuz they just can't stand all you people that live in such a perfect world. Time to move on people

Why didn't you offer to let him return the ball for a refund before this thread started? It sounds like he emailed you explaining that the ball you sold was not from the era you said it was. Allowing the return would have been the right thing to do, and would have saved you from all of these "vindictive" people who hopefully won't be buying anything from you in the future. I know i won't be.