NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2016, 05:39 PM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bxb View Post
Why are rookie cards more valuable than a player's other cards?

So what if it's his first card?
No real good reason beside that collectors collectively determined they were more valuable. This desirability seemed to gain momentum by the mid 1980's with newer issues, and has crept into the vintage market probably within the last 12-15 years.

I always preferred the last Topps card of a player...Roberto Clemente's 1973 was a great card in my eyes, because of his untimely death it showed his entire career stats.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-30-2016, 05:45 PM
frankbmd's Avatar
frankbmd frankbmd is offline
Fr@nk Burke++
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Between the 1st tee and the 19th hole
Posts: 7,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianp-beme View Post
No real good reason beside that collectors collectively determined they were more valuable. This desirability seemed to gain momentum by the mid 1980's with newer issues, and has crept into the vintage market probably within the last 12-15 years.

I always preferred the last Topps card of a player...Roberto Clemente's 1973 was a great card in my eyes, because of his untimely death it showed his entire career stats.

Brian
That's why Brian's collection consists exclusively of players who had only a single card issued, both their rookie and last card rolled into one.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER.

GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES


274/1000 Monster Number

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:05 PM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbmd View Post
That's why Brian's collection consists exclusively of players who had only a single card issued, both their rookie and last card rolled into one.
Man if it were only so. That would take up a lot less space. Space is the final downsizing frontier.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:20 PM
Touch'EmAll's Avatar
Touch'EmAll Touch'EmAll is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,106
Default Who knows

In coin collecting the first year of a new issue is usually no big deal - unless accompanied by a real low mintage. Most rookie cards do not necessarily have low "mintages" compared to others of a player.

Someone back around the late 1970's came up with the idea of holy grail Rookie designation - and the herd followed - and is still following. OK, go get 'em tigers, get those rookie cards!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:49 PM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,397
Default

Ok, the actual explanation for "rookie" cards being worth more -

Before collecting became somewhat mainstream cards were mostly collected by kids. Kids typically collected for 2-4 years, and after that time the cards went into a sort of collecting limbo. Maybe given to a younger brother (Or sister as I did with some of mine) Maybe stored out of sight until mom found them after HS graduation, maybe just tossed.

Also typically, a player didn't become an overnight sensation. So they might not get a really big following until maybe their 4th or 5th year.

When cards were being disposed of sometimes a kid would hang on to a few favorites. These were more often established stars or locally popular players.
So the first cards of some players survived in lower quantities than cards of stars.

Once the hobby became more mainstream, this became more of a traditional thing rather than anything based on there being fewer available. And with the proliferation of draft pick cards and eventually a few high school prospects sets it got silly. So I believe it was Beckett that produced a definition of a "rookie card" That has become a generally accepted standard.

Whether that definition truly makes sense is a matter perhaps for its own thread, I personally disagree with it on some points, but it's accepted and overall isn't bad although it gets trickier for prewar cards. (It's skewed towards what can be reliably sold by a dealer, so most of the tougher cards are out, and the mainstream ones that exist in quantities from "not too tough" to "my goodness they made a lot of these" are in.


There are a number of people here who collected before what I consider the first big boom, roughly 77-81 and a bit beyond, Their recollection of the timing may be different as 77 was when I began seriously collecting and 77- 81 saw a large increase in full time or more serious part time dealers. From a handful in the country to several in any major city. The downturn caused by the 81 strike took out a bunch of the ones that weren't well funded or just weren't all that into being a card dealer.


Steve B
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:17 PM
xplainer's Avatar
xplainer xplainer is offline
Jimmy Knowle$
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbmd View Post
That's why Brian's collection consists exclusively of players who had only a single card issued, both their rookie and last card rolled into one.
Now, that is an interesting concept Frank. I really like that.
Get a PSA 10, you probably have a 1 of 1.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
probably a stupid question regarding psa/dna milkit1 Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports 5 07-21-2013 06:13 PM
Stupid question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 06-05-2007 01:57 PM
stupid question #44 Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 10-07-2006 05:52 AM
I don't usually post stupid auctions Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 09-07-2006 02:07 PM
Using my stupid post allowance Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 08-25-2002 05:51 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.


ebay GSB