![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
a) Are the people that own and think it isn't over-valued the ones hyping the value? b) Is the reason people that don't own it continue not to own it because they feel it is over valued and have other cards they would rather spend their money on? I don't own a 51 Bowman Mantle and believe it is under-valued in comparison to his second year card with several design flaws that was double printed. I would not call it the "definitive" card in card collecting. It is the definitive card in card investing. Yet there is no "definitive" card in collecting because collecting varies by people. There are collectors that don't collect Topps or any card made since their inception. Also, though I have heard of HOF rookie collections, I have never heard of a 2nd year HOF collection.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums Last edited by bn2cardz; 07-01-2016 at 11:20 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well I am glad you understood it. I reread it and couldn't. haha. I cleaned up some grammar and I hope it makes more sense now.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think there are great many people who would like a '52T Mantle and who could afford one at current levels who don't buy one bc they think it is overvalued.
It's simple really, it's not worth what it would cost them to them. Not everyone is green with envy to own this card.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." Last edited by HRBAKER; 07-01-2016 at 12:19 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't envy those who have a 1952 Topps Mantle - I wish I DID have one.
IF I had one, I'd keep it! But I don't have one and would not pay the going rate to own one now. I would not be happy to own "a Beater", but I would NOT spend what it takes to own a "nice" one. Does THAT make sense? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
OK. Recently a nicely centered PSA 5 Topps 1952 Mickey Mantle went for $125,000.
If you were given $125,000. and had to spend it on 1-3 cards, what would you buy? I would go for a minimum PSA 5, T206 Cobb green and the best 1920's something Ruth's (1 or 2 cards) with remainder of money. Last edited by Touch'EmAll; 07-01-2016 at 01:44 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe when Mr McGuire recommended plastics to Benjamin Braddock back in 1967 he was predicting PSA
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think I remember them also discussing flips and poppage in some of the outtakes.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lowest Valued Rarities? | ksabet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-28-2014 08:58 PM |
Under valued (or underappreciated autographs) | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 07-30-2012 11:54 AM |
Are all PSA 5s equally valued? | wmullis | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-26-2011 04:12 PM |
D303 - under appreciated and valued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-08-2003 03:33 PM |
Most under-valued vintage set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-01-2002 11:13 AM |