|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
David, you should make that image your avatar.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I didn't know that saying they correctly graded one card made me a "PSA advocate." Now I know. Regardless, your card is a 2, and if you subbed it 10x it would never get higher than a 2.5 . Nevertheless, I love the card and would be proud to own it.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am sure Please Submit Again would love for it to be sent in 10 more times. That would be $800 in fees and about $250 in gouged shipping costs. I have heard of people doing that. It's a great racket. My question is if PSA got it wrong then why are they charging to change a mistake? LMAO I fix my mistakes for free. .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is probably a disparity between their written grading standards and how they really grade. Especially on a major card. According to the written word yes it could be a 3 but I would be surprised if they bumped it.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's only cards and a conversation, no more and no less. I don't think PSA is a bad company. I would guess 80%-90% of the value of my card holdings are now in PSA holders (with rookies included). I just think they are way, way, way overrated. But too, I have to go with the perceived notion they are better, for buying and selling, as that is the game in the hobby so it seems. I will have to pay (and sell for) less, the other TPG companies holders in certain parts of the hobby. And I agree, we can politely agree to disagree. It's all good....take care
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 06-20-2016 at 10:40 AM. Reason: changed percent to probably be more accurate |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
would bring up the Wagner. Like I said before completely different regime at PSA now than back then. I do not hold the current SGC regime responsible for the fiascos graded during the Merkle period including that absolute joke of a Doyle and I do not blame Joe Orlando run PSA for the Rocchi regime and their misses.
Last edited by glynparson; 06-20-2016 at 12:50 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-20-2016 at 12:54 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thoughts About A Grading Proposal | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-02-2016 10:50 AM |
| Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-16-2014 09:58 PM |
| Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 11-14-2014 04:36 PM |
| My thoughts on these stupid grading posts | Kenny Cole | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 91 | 05-22-2010 12:47 AM |
| Thoughts on grading | ptowncoug3012 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-30-2010 10:52 PM |