 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15
06-12-2016, 09:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Grading
[ATTACH][/ATTACH][ATTACH][/ATTACH]I personally think they should add a 5th component to the grading categories. Centering, edges, corners, surface, AND PRESENTATION. This would lower the grade of uglier, but more technically sound cards, and raise the grade of the nicer looking cards that have technical flaws. Here is an example. Mine is the SGC 4 on the left (suffers from a nearly invisible 2 inch wrinkle). The other is a psa 5 that I found online. If you gave my card a presentation subgrade of say, a 7, and the psa received a presentation sub of 2 or 3, this would help even out the disparity i think.
Last edited by orly57; 06-12-2016 at 09:27 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC vs. PSA vs. BVG for card grading | Rascal1010 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 03-02-2016 09:20 PM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
| Card Grading... | Tim206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-16-2011 05:02 PM |
| When will Grading Card Co.'s Consider.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-10-2007 09:51 AM |
| SGC grading of this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 02-02-2006 11:36 AM |
Threaded Mode