Liquidity & Investing vs collecting

[4815162342]

There are obviously a lot of hedge fund guys pouring cash into the hobby right now who feel the same way as you do. I'll stick to collecting scarce-rare seldom-traded baseball cards that I like, and investing in mutual funds.

[Peter_Spaeth]

If you believe what you say, you should be buying Jordan 10s. Just be careful, seriously, not to get a fake one, there are some pretty convincing ones from the Mexican guy out there.

My problem with 10s always has been that to me they are just Mint cards with a different flip for the most part -- that you couldn't tell apart but for the flip -- but in an era when flips seem to be independent commodities that seems not to matter.

[Leon]

I think it's a good and relevant debate. I recently converting cash sitting in the back earning literally 2 bucks a month in interest into a '52 Mantle at a decent price. I personally think the '52 Mick is a commodity, and a good one at that. It will (imo) do a whole lot better than 2 bucks a month when he finds a new home. SMU doesn't take '52 Micks in their payment plan so he WILL find a home in the next 3 yrs. . I like looking at him a lot better than numbers in a bank account too!!

[Cozumeleno]

My problem with investing big money into any slabbed card, pre-war or not, is a grading company's reputation (i.e. GAI) can be damaged beyond belief and severely devalue their cards overnight. As purely a hypothetical example, what if news broke that any of the big two/three companies was caught giving many faulty grades for personal gain, etc.? Or purposefully slabbing trimmed/altered/fake cards?

If I ever poured $30,000 into a card, I'd feel much more secure putting it into a rare card in general than I would putting it into a nominal card marked up 100x simply because of a grader's opinion. That's always seemed incredibly risky to me. I have no problem with graded cards and especially enjoy the protection they can provide to cards that could be damaged without a slab. But I just wouldn't have the desire to pay that kind of a premium for something based on opinion.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Cozumeleno

My problem with investing big money into any slabbed card, pre-war or not, is a grading company's reputation (i.e. GAI) can be damaged beyond belief and severely devalue their cards overnight. As purely a hypothetical example, what if news broke that any of the big two/three companies was caught giving many faulty grades for personal gain, etc.? Or purposefully slabbing trimmed/altered/fake cards?

If I ever poured $30,000 into a card, I'd feel much more secure putting it into a rare card in general than I would putting it into a nominal card marked up 100x simply because of a grader's opinion. That's always seemed incredibly risky to me. I have no problem with graded cards and especially enjoy the protection they can provide to cards that could be damaged without a slab. But I just wouldn't have the desire to pay that kind of a premium for something based on opinion.

This is why I bought into what I think is the safest bet in the hobby. I wasn't going for a 20k HOF'er OJ which Richard, Keith and Jay already own.

[Snapolit1]

The idea of something like Jordan cards being a riskier investment because he's still alive and his story isn't finalized yet is something I never really thought about. Sure at some point OJ Simpson and Bonds were fetching big bucks too. The guy who paid big bucks for a Sammy Sosa homerun ball has likely jumped off a bridge long ago. Jordan's reputation hasn't exactly taken off since he retired and who knows what he's gambling on these days.

By the way, I have zero interest in Jordan cards and never plan to buy one. I'd drop big bucks on Ruth any day over Jordan.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Why even own the physical card? The flips could be traded on an exchange and your online account will show your holdings. The cards themselves would be as obsolete as stock certificates.

[Econteachert205]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Why even own the physical card? The flips could be traded on an exchange and your online account will show your holdings. The cards themselves would be as obsolete as stock certificates.

If PSA can figure this out, it will happen. Others can chime in but I think they would need the ok from the SEC and get all the necessary securities licenses to act as a broker and then it could happen. Pretty unlikely though...

As for the Jordan, I have mine (a psa 8 oc). It's probably the best investment card I've ever bought. I wish it was a straight 8 but it presents really well and was reasonable about 1 1/2 years ago. I also agree with liquidity as a key factor to investing.

[pcoz]

I'm astounded by the record prices of the Mantle/Clemente RC's, but especially the Jordan RC, with thousands and thousands slabbed. I do have a Clemente because I'm a Pirates fan, but I collect and invest in prewar for their scarcity and investment potential. I'll buy a Ruth RC with approx 75-80(a bunch have been crossed), who was the best baseball player of all time, having a 100 year old card, than chase a holder and grade of the cards today. Modern cards for that reason to me are significantly riskier. Prewar prices have been consistently solid and increasing, postwar with the PSA registry driving prices have done great as well, but modern cards to me are a risky proposition. Too volatile, too many of them, and too unpredictable in the future for me. Great point on that the players story may not be done yet even though they're done playing. No one is going to rewrite Ruth, Jackson, Cobb or Wagner's stories.

[ls7plus]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

If you believe what you say, you should be buying Jordan 10s. Just be careful, seriously, not to get a fake one, there are some pretty convincing ones from the Mexican guy out there.

My problem with 10s always has been that to me they are just Mint cards with a different flip for the most part -- that you couldn't tell apart but for the flip -- but in an era when flips seem to be independent commodities that seems not to matter.

+1. Buy the card, not the holder. There are far too many "9's" which will compete with the "10's," with very little substantive difference between the two. Specifically, PSA has graded 2,418 "9's," 6,745 "8's," and 158 "8.5's." SGC has graded 308 "8's," 287 8.5's," 136 "9's," and 12 "10's." Taken together, the supply factor of "high grade" Jordan's looms far too large for me to take this card seriously as an investment in the long run. It's value will appreciate similarly to analogous coins in the coin market, where such items, scarce (and definitely not rare) in the highest numerical grade, but much more common in a minimally lower grade, are cyclical in value appreciation. The fact that a high grade Jordan rookie is simply not any kind of real rarity makes for a significant downside risk for the long term. If they're on the upswing and you can pick up one for the right price, flip it as soon as you can make some substantial money. Not at all an item for long term holding, IMHO, and very, very vulnerable to demand swings, whereas you won't see that with classical rarities in vintage cards. The latter will prove much more stable with likely very close to linear appreciation. What works to obtain the latter in EVERY field of collectibles is one simple formula: rare, significant, and in the best condition you can find or afford. The Jordan is not and never will be rare, although it meets the other criteria, but those are the two least important for value.

Highest regards,

Larry