![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably not with a laser, but a scanner and some software could do some of that fairly easily. Centering and size for sure, corners would be a bit more challenging. Edge quality more challenging, and picking up finer elements of the surfaces might be really tough.
As much as we complain about them, a bit of training maybe a week or so can get a motivated 20 something about 90% of the way there. And they're almost always going to be faster than the machine. Business wise that's an ok tradeoff compared to development costs plus a slower machine. Changing the overall business model away from rushing things would be a much bigger improvement. Steve B |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
John Henry, he drove fifteen feet
The steam drill only made nine |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sure that if it was possible, PSA would have already used it and laid off all the humanoids. Dave Hall has plenty of money to devote to R&D (research & development).
Last edited by pkaufman; 05-17-2016 at 02:12 PM. Reason: sp |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It would have to be graded by both a human and a machine. I feel the machine will Also have errors.So maybe have the machine grade it and the person has no idea of the results. Then after the human inputs it's data the machine will also display.
In my hunt for a engagement ring for the wife. I heard that GIA has 15 people grade a diamond and a X-ray of sorts. Then they go with the lowest grade.
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Then John Henry died.
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hah. Not to mention a wife 40 or however many years younger.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you would just need a "mold" card, ie a gem mint original (common from the set) to scan and then program into the computer. The dimensions/centering should always be the same, allowing slight size/centering differences caused by different printing techniques. The scan would look for any imperfections and/or deformities in the surface paper/chrome/plastic, again allowing for slight, allowable imperfections. Then corners. I don't agree at all that these things should be left to subjective, human factors. This isn't a game. It's a grade. It either is or it isn't.
Last edited by sportscardtheory; 05-17-2016 at 03:39 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.
Last edited by begsu1013; 08-23-2016 at 12:08 AM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.
Last edited by begsu1013; 08-23-2016 at 12:08 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1951 Mickey Mantle TYPE 1 Photo Used to Create His 1952 TOPPS Card is now at 20K... | thekingofclout | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 94 | 12-29-2017 01:42 PM |
1950's OAK PREMIERE CARD MACHINE FOR SALE - OFFERS? | jsage | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 05-06-2015 08:27 PM |
Baseball Card Vending Machine | joed25 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 08-29-2014 10:39 AM |
WTB: Exhibit Card Vending Machine | ATP | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 09-05-2013 11:07 PM |
Late 50's Topps Baseball / card vending machine | bigfanNY | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2013 05:02 PM |