 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-04-2016, 05:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Though they're both about as common as ......... well people getting worked up over politics.
I'd prefer the Piedmont. I just like the way Piedmont looks. Sweet Caporal are the ugliest backs in the set to me.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% 
|
|
#2
05-04-2016, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are they both red Cobbs in a 3? If so, I'd go with the Piedmont. Not diamond-cut (the one aesthetic thing that will turn me off on a t206), and lower population.
If only the Sweet Cap is a Cobbie, I'd go with that one. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question from a game-used-bat novice | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 02-12-2008 04:11 PM |
| Novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-06-2007 08:27 PM |
| Question from a Grading Novice | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-18-2005 05:00 PM |
| Reprints of Baseball cards in book - Novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-30-2005 02:37 PM |
| Another novice question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-04-2004 06:08 AM |
Hybrid Mode
