How to get PSA to reduce POP

[pokerplyr80]

Mail in the flip and it will be removed from the population report.

No need to destroy the cards.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

Mail in the flip and it will be removed from the population report.

No need to destroy the cards.

That may not accomplish Jake's objective because the cards could still be holdered again.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

That may not accomplish Jake's objective because the cards could still be holdered again.

right but i dont think PSA really cares about that point and now that i think about it , what would they care.....as long as they are removed from the POP thats fine...who knows how many raw cards are out there when people bid on low POP cards from cards in the 1930s-early 50s..bidders dont appear to care...they only care about what is graded...if its not graded it doesnt exist it appears..

[begsu1013]

an asteroid the size of texas should do the trick.

[Rookiemonster]

I wonder how many cards pops are already over the actual pop in existence due to resubmitting and cross submitting.

[clydepepper]

Originally Posted by Rookiemonster

I wonder how many cards pops are already over the actual pop in existence due to resubmitting and cross submitting.

How 'bout a 1-of-1 that's listed twice. The numbskull previous owner of my Allegeheny Mathewson resubmitted. The 'brainiac' had a '6' and the resubmission came back as a '5'.

I think that should be adjusted down as it is the only one and I will NEVER resubmit it. I may decide to contact PSA about this but I'm not sure it would do any good.

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by Rookiemonster

I wonder how many cards pops are already over the actual pop in existence due to resubmitting and cross submitting.

All of them would be my guess.

[Rookiemonster]

Lol maybe not all of them at least not yet.im not sure of the player your talking about. But what set is the card from Clyde ?

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Rookiemonster

I wonder how many cards pops are already over the actual pop in existence due to resubmitting and cross submitting.

when it comes to the super high end cards.which are the top condition for the best sets ...there isnt resubmitting...like a psa 8 hank aaron topps hank aaron..i really doubt they were removed from a holder for an attempt at an 9....and any reviews that turn an 8 into a 9 are accounted for on pop

[KCRfan1]

I didn't know that Jesse. Good to know that PSA will update reports with flips.

[sbfinley]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

If someone has all of a certain card and wants to destroy 95% of them to ensure the 'destroyed' cards no longer find their way onto the market place.(and ease the new bidders' mind).

Go..ah..you.. I can't even...

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

when it comes to the super high end cards.which are the top condition for the best sets ...there isnt resubmitting...like a psa 8 hank aaron topps hank aaron..i really doubt they were removed from a holder for an attempt at an 9....and any reviews that turn an 8 into a 9 are accounted for on pop

This happens a whole lot more than you'd think.

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

when it comes to the super high end cards.which are the top condition for the best sets ...there isnt resubmitting...like a psa 8 hank aaron topps hank aaron..i really doubt they were removed from a holder for an attempt at an 9....and any reviews that turn an 8 into a 9 are accounted for on pop

Im sure some of the SGC and BVG 9s used to be PSA 7s or 8s at one point. Before the huge value difference between PSA and SGC it was probably even more common to go back and forth. If one grading company crosses a card I doubt the flip is sent back to the other and the pop report is inflated. I don't have any stats to back this up but it seems reasonable this is the case with most cards.