 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
04-16-2016, 12:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, the current thought is that PSA is strict currently, especially much harder on short (MINSIZREQ) cards that used to get number grades. In fact, there are collectors of the 1975 Minis that only buy newer graded cards because they know many of the old ones wouldn't measure up to the correct size in PSA's old holders.
Some people cracking out 6s and 7s trying to get bumps or crossovers and getting hosed on MINSIZREQ or ALTERED Trimmed. I sent in 100 EX or better cards of the T51 series and was thrilled to get two 8s, 10 7s, 10 6.5's, 17 6's, etc. But these were collected over the years by someone with a great eye. Some of them were Mint, but I never expected to get such high scores.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 04-16-2016 at 02:39 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How on-time are grading companies? | granite75 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2014 07:39 AM |
| PSA consistency | lsutigers1973 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 08-07-2014 08:09 PM |
| Set Consistency | vintagebaseballcardguy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 06-14-2013 06:08 PM |
| Does set consistency matter to you? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-11-2005 03:14 PM |
| first time I have seen this grading company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-07-2003 08:20 PM |
Threaded Mode