![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the 70 topps Super
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I did not know about that '68 error. I guess I have to get out my card and take a look. I got it out of a shoebox collection I bought a few years ago. Has some technical flaws but I am content with it since it only cost me a buck raw:
![]() My favorites are the 1969 regular and AS issue. Again, the regular card was from that collection I bought. The AS card I've had for decades. Both were slabbed recently: ![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is my 8.5 for comparison.
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Zach Wheat,
Thanks for that website info. I'm going to look into possibly signing up at collectible.com --- Hi Exhibitman, That card looks very nice, and at a price that cannot be beat! --- Hi Holybull and jb67, Those are both such amazing examples of the Bench card. To my eyes those would both seem to rate as a 10. If you don't mind, can you offer your insight on what perceived flaws the cards might have, that do not show to me. --- Best to all, John |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi John,
Just a note, collectible.com is for Hollywood memorabilia, we are spelled with an "A". www.collectable.com - Dan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
My 8.5 Bench rookie looks to have a lightly touched corner which would make it a 9 right away and on the back there is an ever so slight dark spot which probably kept this card from being a PSA 9. Here is the back. The centering on the back is better than most PSA 9's I have seen. I ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are a few of my non-Topps Bench rookies....
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Big Red Machine,
Firstly, awesome user name. Secondly, awesome Bench cards! I’ve never seen either of those cards in person before, so that are definitely some great quality items! --- BTW, silly me. I think I had a brain lapse when I asked what model Reds cap that Johnny was wearing in his 1968 Topps card. The attached 1969 Topps card answers that. Best, John |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
wow....you wish to sell one of the Kahns??? Thanks, Michael.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1968 Topps Johnny Bench Rookie, variation or printing flaw error? | Cliff Bowman | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 09-12-2021 11:26 AM |
Johnny Bench 1968 Topps #247 Rookie Card SGC 88 NM/MT 8 | BlueDevil89 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 09-27-2015 03:18 PM |
f/s: 1968 topps johnny bench rookie psa 6 | chaddurbin | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-11-2012 04:13 PM |
FS: 1968 Topps Johnny Bench Rookie | Jaybird | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-01-2011 12:50 PM |
1968 Topps Johnny Bench Rookie PSA 9(oc) ----SOLD | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-15-2008 09:04 AM |