Anyone watching probstein auctions

[Leon]

Please be careful about our name rule which is at the top of every page.....if someone said that about your auction would you maybe want to know who they were?

Originally Posted by biggsdaddycool

Every time I happen to click a card I like and see Probstein or PWCC, I just turn and walk away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[biggsdaddycool]

Originally Posted by Leon

Please be careful about our name rule which is at the top of every page.....if someone said that about your auction would you maybe want to know who they were?

All I meant was most of their stuff ends up way too rich for my blood. They both advertise everywhere. Did not mean to offend. Apologies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Leon]

No worries. It has nothing to do with where they advertise. This board is different than most in that the name rules (having your name next to your comment when necessary) are in bold print at the top of every page and are enforced as much as possible. Nothing personal....Happy collecting!!

Originally Posted by biggsdaddycool

All I meant was most of their stuff ends up way too rich for my blood. They both advertise everywhere. Did not mean to offend. Apologies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[pawpawdiv9]

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1951-Bowman-...kAAOSw2ENW8C~T

This the one everyone is talking about? The PSA 8 over 20K?
I sold my Mays PSA 7OC on Ebay last year and thought it brought good money then, for what folks considered a 5 because of the OC
http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/GjsAAO...-1J/s-l500.jpg So are we saying the flip says it all? or can we not say that this one should of received a OC as well?
But after looking- Back in December a 7 from Singapore got 9900 and a 6.5 got 8714 in march 20.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by pawpawdiv9

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1951-Bowman-...kAAOSw2ENW8C~T

This the one everyone is talking about? The PSA 8 over 20K?
I sold my Mays PSA 7OC on Ebay last year and thought it brought good money then, for what folks considered a 5 because of the OC
http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/GjsAAO...-1J/s-l500.jpg So are we saying the flip says it all? or can we not say that this one should of received a OC as well?
But after looking- Back in December a 7 from Singapore got 9900 and a 6.5 got 8714 in march 20.

that singapore guy has a looot of nice cards....guess he brought his collection over there while he worked there...who knows . but his cards come up time to time..

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by pawpawdiv9

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1951-Bowman-...kAAOSw2ENW8C~T

This the one everyone is talking about? The PSA 8 over 20K?
I sold my Mays PSA 7OC on Ebay last year and thought it brought good money then, for what folks considered a 5 because of the OC
http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/GjsAAO...-1J/s-l500.jpg So are we saying the flip says it all? or can we not say that this one should of received a OC as well?
But after looking- Back in December a 7 from Singapore got 9900 and a 6.5 got 8714 in march 20.

The 8 up now is probably about as close to an OC qualifier as a card could be while still keeping such a high grade. A small fraction of an inch more top to bottom and that card loses about 90% of its value. Pretty crazy when you think about it but that's the way it is.

[glynparson]

looks within the centering parameters for an 8 to me. Not sure where some think it needs to be a 6 based on its centering. Agree its not perfectly centered but i have seen much worse (centering) especially in sgc holders.

[Rookiemonster]

Originally Posted by glynparson

looks within the centering parameters for an 8 to me. Not sure where some think it needs to be a 6 based on its centering. Agree its not perfectly centered but i have seen much worse (centering) especially in sgc holders.

+1

I prefer a bit of a thinner border on the bottom of the horizontal 51 bowmans .

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by glynparson

looks within the centering parameters for an 8 to me. Not sure where some think it needs to be a 6 based on its centering. Agree its not perfectly centered but i have seen much worse (centering) especially in sgc holders.

I wasn't saying it should be a 6 based on centering, just that it looks like it is very close to being OC. And that on a card with this kind of value that small difference on the boarder amounts to a huge difference in price.

Chris's 7 he mentioned was only slightly off top to bottom more than this one.

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by glynparson

looks within the centering parameters for an 8 to me. Not sure where some think it needs to be a 6 based on its centering. Agree its not perfectly centered but i have seen much worse (centering) especially in sgc holders.

I agree. Even if centering was an issue, the card would get a straight 7 not a 6.....

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by glynparson

looks within the centering parameters for an 8 to me. Not sure where some think it needs to be a 6 based on its centering. Agree its not perfectly centered but i have seen much worse (centering) especially in sgc holders.

People need to read the grading standards. I agree.

[cammb]

Originally Posted by glynparson

looks within the centering parameters for an 8 to me. Not sure where some think it needs to be a 6 based on its centering. Agree its not perfectly centered but i have seen much worse (centering) especially in sgc holders.

That's a laugh.

[ls7plus]

Originally Posted by glynparson

looks within the centering parameters for an 8 to me. Not sure where some think it needs to be a 6 based on its centering. Agree its not perfectly centered but i have seen much worse (centering) especially in sgc holders.

+1 on this.

Regards,

Larry

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

The 8 up now is probably about as close to an OC qualifier as a card could be while still keeping such a high grade. A small fraction of an inch more top to bottom and that card loses about 90% of its value. Pretty crazy when you think about it but that's the way it is.

How does it lose 90 percent of its value? 8s have a tighter centering tolerance than 7s so it would drop to a 7. A big gap still but not 90 percent.

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

How does it lose 90 percent of its value? 8s have a tighter centering tolerance than 7s so it would drop to a 7. A big gap still but not 90 percent.

An 8 to an 8 OC would be about a 90% swing. VCP doesn't have recent data for either but it's 33k vs about 2500. Today it could be 50k vs 5 or 6. Not really sure on thst.

If it got into a 7 holder obviously that's a different story. But I am not completely convinced PSA would only hit a card one grade if someone requested no qualifier. I know that issue has been discussed but it's open to interpretation.

[Beastmode]

Originally Posted by pawpawdiv9

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1951-Bowman-...kAAOSw2ENW8C~T

This the one everyone is talking about? The PSA 8 over 20K?
I sold my Mays PSA 7OC on Ebay last year and thought it brought good money then, for what folks considered a 5 because of the OC
http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/GjsAAO...-1J/s-l500.jpg So are we saying the flip says it all? or can we not say that this one should of received a OC as well?
But after looking- Back in December a 7 from Singapore got 9900 and a 6.5 got 8714 in march 20.

opps!

p***p ( 349Feedback score is 100 to 499) Retracted: US $50,000.00
Bid: Mar-22-16 11:41:31 PDT
Retracted: Mar-22-16 12:09:59 PDT

Looks like another troller looking for max bids.