![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim, that's a pretty great explanation. I have spent my career doing advertising and have printed and die cut more stuff than I care to recall One further expiation that is worth considering is that since there is a very slight natural "bow" to paper and since the blades were basically doing a guillotine cut, a naturally cut T206 has, under a magnification, a very slight front to back slant to it which cannot be perceived by the naked eye but is pretty pronounced under magnification. This is one of the ways trims...since the card is normally laid flat and cut with an exact...is detected.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Curious about T206 cards | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-08-2011 06:07 PM |
T206 Cobb, just a curious observation | jbbama | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-23-2010 10:41 PM |
Curious about this T206 Cobb W/Lenox back.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 75 | 04-16-2009 07:42 AM |
T206 Sheets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 10-17-2008 08:11 PM |
Just curious about the T206 Lumley background... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-09-2008 01:22 AM |