second year cards more valuable than rookies?

[pokerplyr80]

The T210 jackson is a second year worth a lot more than his e90-1 rookie.

[begsu1013]

adding the 62 Williams in an 8 and t210 Jackson back to the original post.


thanks peter and jesse




edit: and i think we have a clear case w/ the most recent 71 munson sale @ $30K

[BeanTown]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

The T210 jackson is a second year worth a lot more than his e90-1 rookie.

Plus, this pre rookie of Joe Jackson shown below. I might add Cy Young to the list to. He Has an 1891/2 JA Rogers cabinet card in street clothes and his Just So 1893 card would be greater.

[Harliduck]

As a set collector these popped into my head...after McClain and Stanley the others may be a bit lame, but certainly fall into the criteria... I do think the first two though are significant...especially if your looking to buy those two in NM for your sets...




1965 Topps Denny McClain RC #236
1966 Topps Denny McClain #540

(66 High Number)


1966 Topps Mickey Stanley RC #198
1967 Topps Mickey Stanley #607

(67 High Number)


1965 Topps Gary Kroll RC #449
1966 Topps Gary Kroll #548

(66 High Number)

1965 Topps George Smith RC #483
1966 Topps George Smith #542

(66 High Number)

1962 Topps Tom Tresh RC #31
1963 Topps Tom Tresh #470

(63 SP)

1962 Topps Don Clendenon RC #86
1963 Topps Don Clendenon #477

(63 SP)