![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorry it came out so big not good at this
haven't shown this for a while http://www.net54baseball.com/attachm...1&d=1458412408 Last edited by rsst206; 03-19-2016 at 12:35 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Holy. Shit.
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ For Sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359...7719430982559/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Current Search: Columbus Solons N172: 2/16 (2nd Pose Team Set) Columbus Solons N173 & Proof Photos: 3/? Pre-1950 Cuban Cards: Focus on Billiken, Macionales, & Aguilitas |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
rsst206 - That T215 Pirate card is amazing. Thanks for sharing!
I posted one of these in the other recent miscut thread but figured I'd share a few more. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess quality control at the Croft's Cocoa printing facility was either very good (if these are scraps), or very poor (if these were issued with the product).
Brian |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yes, the quality control on Crofts Cocoa E92s was not the greatest. My feeling has always been that they were not issued with the product but handed out at the counter of one of several Montague candy stores across Philadelphia. The fronts on all of these back miscuts are fine so my guess is that these were distributed just like any other Crofts Cocoa card was and were not scraps. I can't imagine any kid back in the day complaining about receiving one of these because the ad on the back was miscut or upside down ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This one is intriguing......it is running currently with Greg Bussineau. What is interesting is the grade on the card!?!?!?!? To me, the card looks incredible on the front, possibly an 8 on a good day? I understand that they have to consider the back BUT I wonder if this card was slabbed by PSA if it might be a PSA 8 (MC) which to me would be a heck of a lot better than the current 3 that it has. Any differing opinions on this?
Peace, Mike 8218797009_b_lg.jpg 8218797009_f_lg.jpg Last edited by vthobby; 03-24-2016 at 07:31 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Show your Goudey Errors - Misprints, Ghosts, Severe Miscuts | deadballera | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-24-2020 07:26 PM |
F/S Miscuts from 60`s & 70`s | pow323 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-15-2015 10:38 AM |
WOW awesome cy young | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-17-2008 12:53 AM |
Awesome new N54 look! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-12-2007 05:11 PM |
E95 Cicotte SGC 40 but awesome | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 10-27-2006 06:54 PM |