Show...me...your print variations!

[savedfrommyspokes]

Nice P/Us.....the back of the 181 Porterfield card has the extension of the line found on back of the 198 Davenport card.

Cliff posted a pic here:

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=171784

[ALR-bishop]

There is some possibility the Finnigan is a variation. The dot on his chin may have been an errant dot for the i in Finnigan that was removed due to it's location on his face...maybe not

Davie has print defects in bottom of Tiger logo. Yellow outside the cat and on right red inside

[ALR-bishop]

On Daley the card without the white dot is a WB, but the white dot appears on both white and gray back cards

Junk Wax Variation from sheet A* not A*B. The bold back seems to be the same as the cards used in Desert Shield and Desert Storm and also part of the bold back set. These were out of wax packs.

[savedfrommyspokes]

I have not seen the two white lines that cross the "I", "N" and top left corner of the "D" in the team's name previously discussed. Out of about 120 copies between ebay and COMC, I found 4 copies which have the white lines across the team name.

[tedzan]

Not exactly variations....but, color printing errors. Campy missing Orange ink, and High #'s Doby, Sisler and Snider missing Yellow ink.





TED Z
.

[ALR-bishop]

Ted--In 1982 Topps had it’s Blackless and apparently in 1949 Bowman had it's Yellowless

[Exhibitman]

The lovely thing about collecting print freaks is that most dealers classify them as junk. I picked these out of junk boxes at the National:

[ALR-bishop]

You could collect hobby recognized variations, recurring print defects, one time print defects, out of registrations, wrong backs ( or fronts ), blank backs, proofs, miscuts , or just some of the above. Sometime back I chose to stick to recognized variations and recurring print defects on the theory there has to be some limits

I still wonder if one searched long enough you could find a variant for any pre 1981 post war card ( The only pre war set I collect also has a variation for each card in the set)

[mikemb]

Originally Posted by Exhibitman

The lovely thing about collecting print freaks is that most dealers classify them as junk. I picked these out of junk boxes at the National:

There is even less demand for those wuth the error on the back:





Mike

[JustinD]

Originally Posted by Exhibitman

The lovely thing about collecting print freaks is that most dealers classify them as junk. I picked these out of junk boxes at the National:

I love drastic miscuts and if I found a Yount cut that bad in a junk box it would have made my day.