second year cards more valuable than rookies?

pokerplyr80 · #1 03-08-2016, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

you mean unattractive set of a different company...if its the same company is going to have to be a condition sensitive etc

This is mostly correct. With the importance and value of RCS a card would have to be condition sensitive or part of a rare series, short print, etc to be worth more. That's why there are such few examples. Second year cards that just look better like a 69 Ryan or 64 Rose aren't worth more for their appearance alone.

begsu1013 · #2 03-08-2016, 07:55 AM

that works. good example and will definitely add that to the list.

pokerplyr80 · #3 03-08-2016, 12:11 PM

It's an 11 year gap but the 52 topps Reese sells for more than his 41 playball RC in most grades.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
most valuable signed cards	theshleps	Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports	9	03-30-2015 05:32 PM
Most Valuable Cards in the hobby	Yankeefan51	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	58	01-06-2013 04:55 PM
1970's Topps most valuable cards	trobba	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	17	12-05-2009 04:02 PM
Best year for Rookies?	Archive	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	21	02-29-2008 03:57 PM
Protect your valuable cards . . .	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	6	11-21-2004 04:38 PM