"Lucky 7" find - Cobb with Cobb back

[Pat R]

Originally Posted by tedzan

Pat R.

Perhaps, I got carried away with my comments regarding the Ty Cobb Tobacco card and the 1910 COUPON series of 68 cards....because I strongly feel that these 69 cards
should be included in the T206 family; and, that there are really 17 basic Tobacco brands within the T206 timeline. All 69 of these cards were issued in the Spring of 1910.

What really ticked me off was your response (cited here) questioning the date of the Ty Cobb Tobacco card [I guess for whatever reason it does not jive with your agenda]:




The date....Feb. and Mar. of 1910....of these Newspaper clippings is identified by the fellow who posted it, Shawn. Shawn was an excellent contributor to Net54 back in 2009.

So, are you are accusing Shawn of lying about this date ?







TED Z
.

I'm not accusing Shawn of lying if you read his response he states that "the
months seem to be Feb. and Mar. 1910" which leads me to believe he Didn't
find a definite date on these clippings.

And if you could please show me where it clearly states when the Cobb/Cobb
cards were circulated in the clippings I'd appreciate it, Perhaps I'm missing that.

[smokelessjoe]

Originally Posted by Pat R

I'm not accusing Shawn of lying if you read his response he states that "the
months seem to be Feb. and Mar. 1910" which leads me to believe he Didn't
find a definite date on these clippings.

And if you could please show me where it clearly states when the Cobb/Cobb
cards were circulated in the clippings I'd appreciate it, Perhaps I'm missing that.

The dates were most definitely Feb & March of 1910 for the articles that I posted... My statement about "the months seem to be" was a generalization meaning that "so far" this seems to be the trend.... At the time, there was still a lot of research to do....

[Pat R]

Originally Posted by smokelessjoe

The dates were most definitely Feb & March of 1910 for the articles that I posted... My statement about "the months seem to be" was a generalization meaning that "so far" this seems to be the trend.... At the time, there was still a lot of research to do....

Thank you Shawn, I just wanted to make it clear that I wasn't calling anyone
a liar. I was only saying I didn't see a date on the clippings But Ted has a bad
habit of trying to put words in peoples mouths.

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Pat R

Thank you Shawn, I just wanted to make it clear that I wasn't calling anyone
a liar. I was only saying I didn't see a date on the clippings But Ted has a bad
habit of trying to put words in peoples mouths.

What the hell are you saying here ? .... "But Ted has a bad habit of trying to put words in peoples mouths."

I did NOT "put words" in your mouth ! ! .... I simply asked you a question in response to "wise-a$$" remark you made regarding my Post #81.

This crap of your's is sidetracking what is a great thread. It's time to grow up, and quit your snide remarks on whatever meaningful inputs on this subject
matter that I have been posting in this thread.


TED Z
.

[smokelessjoe]

I posted this several years ago - Neat adv. stating 10c per package...

March 10 1910 Augusta Ga. Paper.

Also notice at the bottom it states:

Reidsville NC
Atlanta Ga
Sanfrancisco Cal

[rats60]

Originally Posted by smokelessjoe

I posted this several years ago - Neat adv. stating 10c per package...

March 10 1910 Augusta Ga. Paper.

Also notice at the bottom it states:

Reidsville NC
Atlanta Ga
Sanfrancisco Cal

Interesting, F.R. Penn Tobacco Co. wasn't purchased by ATC until 1911. Were these issued in 1910 by Penn or in 1911 by ATC right before they were broken up?

[smokelessjoe]

This is another helpful Thread that may answer some of the ownership questions.

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...122677&page=12