![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ryan fan here and the grades do seem appropriate.
biggest factor overlooked by new submitters is the surface of the card, which we can't pick up on in scans. the gloss, scratches and even a minute surface wrinkle can take a 9 or 10 to an auto 5. i did it starting off as well. i think a lot of us have. but the first sub always hurts. i would not resub these as the potential payoff does not seem worth the reward. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Grades are fair. 69 has some janky corners.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I saw the OP w/the 1969 Ryan first thought I had was "4". I got slammed with a 4 on a 69 Jackson with similar nice presentation. The graders there are really bitchy about 1969 corners, I guess:
![]() I'd leave the 68 and 70 in the holders; those grades are fair. The 69 presents nicer, perhaps a 5 or 5.5, but it isn't a six and I don't think going for a resub would get you more than half a grade.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 02-18-2016 at 12:01 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with others, grades seem fair IMO.
68 looks sharp but the OC may have kept it from the 6. 69 looks like VG-EX corners. I thought it would get a 4 or 5. 70 looks like a 6 or 7, but hard to tell. Like begsu said, there's a lot that the community cannot see with just scans. PSA uses loupes, so their eyes are much much better on these things. I doubt that you would get worse grades if you resubmitted them, but I dont think that you'd see much improvement on any of them either. The only card worth the risk to maybe try and resubmit would be the 68 RC. Last edited by wilkiebaby11; 02-18-2016 at 12:41 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the help guys. I really appreciate it.
I think I may send the 68 back in just because it seems worth it to me to give it a shot if PSA does indeed upgrade cards through review, but after hearing responses I agree with the grades on the other two so will sell as is. Follow up - Is it always best to crack out and resubmit or are there success stories with getting a full point + on a review? On the PSA 4 (1969 Ryan), does it sell higher graded the 4 or Raw? And what are everyone's thoughts on cracking out a subbed card to list it for sale? Is it considered any bit of deception or is it common practice and you've all done it? Exhibit man, send that Jackson back in man--what a ripoff grade IMO. I have a worse looking 5. Last edited by murphy8276; 02-20-2016 at 10:41 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
do not attempt to crack that 68 ryan if it's your first attempt.
buy a bunch of cheap whatever cards that are in the new holder and practice first. again, the new holder. older ones were quite easy. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1968 Topps Nolan Ryan | Peter_Spaeth | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 01-17-2016 09:07 PM |
BOTH SOLD: 1969 Topps #533 Nolan Ryan PSA 7 & 1971 Topps #513 Nolan Ryan PSA 7 | wilkiebaby11 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 3 | 09-15-2015 08:15 PM |
Looking for 1968 Topps Nolan Ryan | vintagehofrookies | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 08-04-2009 09:47 AM |
WTB beater 1969 or 1970 Topps Nolan Ryan | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-20-2008 10:06 AM |
FS: 1968 Topps #177 Nolan Ryan M/NM | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 02-28-2008 06:04 PM |