 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
02-16-2016, 10:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Al,
Can't speak for every year, but for 1952, I'd say nope. You couldn't do it with just any random card in the set. At least with regard to RECURRING print defects. Sure if you count one time defects on a card as a variation like the Bartirome with the overprinted red ink on back - you probably could find something on every card in the set. But in my opinion, that card is not a variation. It's just a one off printing mistake. Makes it one of a kind. But not an addition to the checklist. Cheers, Patrick 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |
Threaded Mode