![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First of all, not all Old Judges have faded by any means -- many are still sharp with great contrast. Second, Old Judges were not printed -- as others have stated, they are photographs (technically albumen prints) glued on cardboard. Albumen prints, the most popular form of mass-produced photography in the 19th century, tend to fade over time with exposure to light, but they're usually ok if they're kept out of light. Jay Miller or Joe G. would know more about this than I do, and maybe they'll chime in.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M116 Cobb- faded at best? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-10-2015 12:30 PM |
WTB: A non-faded, SGC 3+ n172 Old Judge common | Stetson_1883 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-27-2014 01:05 AM |
B: A non-faded, SGC 3+ n172 Old Judge common | Stetson_1883 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-26-2014 06:32 PM |
Problem - Faded autographs | John V | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 12-04-2009 11:38 AM |
Is this a variation or merely a faded card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-07-2006 05:35 PM |