![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is really great. You can see why they would be cut up even if they survived the printer's blade - all of the vertical repetition isn't as appealing as, say, a sheet with all different players on it, which would be far more displayable. Great job!
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know you've put a tremendous amount of time and effort into this. Flat out awesome!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is really amazing work Pat. I can't imagine how much time you put into this, but the 12x17 sheet layout seems to make sense. I think this might be the closest we'll all come to seeing what an actual T206 sheet looked like.
If we gave out awards for expanding the knowledge of the Monster, you'd definitely collect some hardware!! ![]() Best, Steve
__________________
___________________ T206 Master Set:103/524 T206 HOFers: 22/76 T206 SLers: 11/48 T206 Back Run: 28/39 Desiderata You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Strive to be happy. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great work and effort!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's an example of another Gibson scratch that adds support to his
positioning on this sheet. The positions of the three different scratches across the template are not where the rows would be vertically I just drew them there using existing scratches to have an idea where new scratches might be found on each back. Jon (jcfowler6) posted these Gibson pics in post #97 of the plate scratch thread. I kept a scan for my records but hadn't assigned it to a sheet and I had forgot about it until I just put this new Gibson in my files. The upper scratch is pretty faint compared to the lower scratch so there are a large number of them that are unconfirmed. Jon's Gibson lines up in the same horizontal row as the new lower Gibson scratch and is pretty close to where it was drawn by simply connecting a couple of the confirmed upper scratches to create a line across the whole sheet. Last edited by Pat R; 02-06-2016 at 01:34 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What a wonderful result Pat! When I first mentioned the scratches I'd hoped for a result like that in maybe a couple decades
![]() I'm thinking the sheet may have been wider, unless I'm not understanding the layout showing the scratches The Hahn/Wilhelm and Murphy/Davis that are in the middle- extending that line left brings it right to the level shown for the right column, ?/O'Leary. So maybe there was a bit more to the right side. 2 unknowns then Hahn/Wilhelm then Murphy/Davis then..........Maybe more? Way back I looked at pop reports for the 150 onlys, and found a definite grouping for those subjects, two clear groups of 6 and the couple outliers like the Magie and the Wagner. A sheet with a partial repeat would explain that. Steve B |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Pat
Excellent work as always! Some aspects of your sheet layout I definitely agree with, others I'm just not sure about at this time. Plate scratches are pretty solid evidence and I need more time to research the subject. One thing that leads me to more questions than answers is the card below which has a Piedmont 150 back. Jantz |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Incredible. Great work, bravo.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I've looked at the information Pat has provided and have concluded (and I think Pat has too), that there was more than one press run for the Piedmont 150 subjects and that the layouts likely changed. To date, no two-name card in Piedmont 150 has exhibited a plate scratch. Secondly, while I believe that in this sheet's case the vertical subjects were the same all the way down, Pat's depiction only shows four rows with the plate scratches. Other parts of the sheet vertically "could" have had a different order which would lead to the existence of the two-name Hinchman-Stovall. Note that there is also two instances of Powell-O'Leary (both currently attributed to this sheet); Berten (Batting) also appears with Dooin as does Konetchy with Jennings. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just wondering about printing techniques giving further insight to T206 page layout. | iwantitiwinit | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-05-2014 06:27 AM |
E92 or other E Card Set Layout | Jaybird | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-17-2012 07:00 PM |
1910 Baseball Sheet Music - Complete | IronHorse2130 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 12-30-2010 08:55 AM |
W504 Brroklyn Complete Sheet | jim | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-17-2010 07:49 PM |
1948 LEAF complete on an uncut sheet | Archive | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 15 | 08-24-2007 06:15 AM |