![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mick
I think you present a compelling case. I'm not a BB guy but I for 1 am always leery of GU that comes out of nowhere. Kind of appears that the tag on the Stilt is beat while the rest of the jersey looks pristine but then again I'm no self appointed expert so what would I know!! I can't see spending any money on significant GU that can't be proven with a 100% photo match. If all you got as proof is a jersey to spec & sum opinion that is written in a way so that an AH doesn't have to assume any liability than I'm out. I'm surprised that a consigner of such an "important piece" wouldn't consign with an AH whose known speciality in the industry is BB. Maybe its just me but bidding seams rather low for such a "historic piece" don't you think? Ron Kosiewicz |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good eye on tag. And you speak the truth about perfect photo identified specimen. A10=photomatch NO LESS. Only LOA I like is a positive ID Photo. Anything else is blah blah blah on paper.
Mike Last edited by mickeymao34; 02-04-2016 at 06:23 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are things on the card side we look for too. For me it's big borders because there is less likeliness of them being trimmed. If I collected autographs it would be on official docs and if I collected GU it would have to all be photo matched.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In this day of age of countless AHs where the buck comes before integrity, you would have to go with a spot on photograph as a LOA. It's my belief the AH do not care whether an item is game worn but the perception of it being game worn is all that matters. In the early days of collecting game used the chance of getting a legit game worn item was good as long as spec's were correct. Today, spec's are known by everybody and duplicated (although not with accuracy) even the common players are forged. IMO the very historical items are not going to appear in a AH. More than likely a private sale if it ever even enters market...few do. Collectors of Very vintage and historical game worn jerseys definitely need to do the research and always take that "let the buyers beware" stance. Its unfortunate but an education in this hobby is expensive and learnt the hard way.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
approaching 34k SMH
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ended at 34k not including juice...with juice 40k.. this figure way low for a wilt piece. Legit wilt gamer would surpass 70k easy. But still i feel for the poor dude who has to cut that check.40k aint no chump change. What gets me is the AH's analysis to other examples of Tiernan Laker shirts. If this was researched correctly this does not correlate to given examples spec wise. Most unfortunate. Renege is an option and def part of the biz.
Last edited by mickeymao34; 02-07-2016 at 01:23 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So it looks like another Magic has hit AH market with current bid of 8500. IMO it is the same jersey as the one I used as an example as to what a replica looks like. And it has a Mears A10 stamp of approval! How do they justify a A10 grade? Again, there is ZERO images/pics in existence that would support the Lakers (any player A-Z in Tiernan era) ever to wear a shirt with this type of number font PERIOD. Is anybody seeing the correlations of strings of A10s and AHs????????
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vancouver Mounties Retro Jersey-info please | grainsley | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 10-09-2014 06:06 PM |
Wilt Chamberlain Signed Lakers Jersey | aaroncc | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 1 | 04-16-2014 11:31 AM |
Wilt the Stilt Chamberlain with a known COA | Spartan833 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 07-25-2012 03:22 PM |
Vintage jersey identification info..... | Reno | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 05-16-2011 05:06 PM |