![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do those of you who collect T205s feel they still look nice even in lower grade condition? I was curious as to how the gold coloring has held up over 100+ years. I am new to prewar and am doing some research into different sets, and T205 is one I am curious about. I have seen some older posts where some collectors feel this way and was just wondering what the consensus is...
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a good number of low grades, and I feel many of them present very nicely. But the higher grades can be very beautiful
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I find that with T205s, eye appeal varies substantially more within the same grades than it does in other sets. Sure, you'll be able to find cards in any set that look great but grade low due to technical issues, but there are wild eye-appeal swings with T205s. I'm building a set in (roughly) all PSA 3. Like Econteacher said, the vibrant colors can hide a lot of wrinkles, but the borders on some of them are a nightmare. Dulling of the gold, along with edge/corner wear and chipping, can make a T205 look pretty chewed up, whereas the same type of wear on a white-bordered card wouldn't look nearly as bad. Here's one example, and it's not even really that bad:
Edge Wear Then, you have some cards with absolutely gorgeous fronts (usual Polar Bears) that grade relatively low because of staining on the back: Nice Front, Stained Back The good news is that T205s are plentiful, and even the SPs (with the exception of a couple) come up pretty regularly, so there's a lot to choose from. But building a set with consistent "cosmetics" is an exercise in patience.
__________________
Last edited by Bliggity; 01-28-2016 at 07:23 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by vintagebaseballcardguy; 01-28-2016 at 08:05 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T205 Piedmont 42 - Update? | Jobu | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-17-2015 01:51 PM |
My T205 update | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-16-2014 09:53 AM |
T205 Update! | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-14-2013 07:40 PM |
T205 update set | bbcard1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-15-2010 08:52 PM |
T205.org Update - Gallery | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-06-2008 12:44 PM |