|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Right, if your 8 oc is 95 5 it isn't or shouldn't be going into a 6 holder. And I've seen some 8 ocs that looked for all the world to me like they could get a straight 7.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
if it's a lower grade, it only drops one.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
At the other end of the spectrum, I was told that lower grades do not all have the option of getting a straight grade. For example, you cannot request that a PSA 1 MK just get a 1 because you can't drop the grade to make up for the lack of a qualifier.
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ For Sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359...7719430982559/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
If a certain criteria is required for a certain grade then the card should have to meet that criteria. I don't believe in qualifiers such as (OC). For example, if it doesn't meet the standard center grading for an (8), then it isn't an (8).
__________________
Wanted : Detroit Baseball Cards and Memorabilia ( from 19th Century Detroit Wolverines to Detroit Tigers Ty Cobb to Al Kaline). |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not that it really matters.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I guess the argument against that is you could have a really pristine card that just happened to be cut off center and it shouldn't be grouped in with a card downgraded for wear. In this day and age of high res scans it seems less important anyhow.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
It only drops 2 grades 1 for lower in weighting for the set registry. For an actual grade on the flip it will lower to the standards reflected by the severity of the qualifier.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Learning something new everyday I come on here.
I had no idea one could ask for a lower grade, or ask for anything. Just thought you sent the card in and it came back professionally graded with whatever numbers/letters remarks and that was it. I assume most see the letters "OC" or "MK" as a bad thing and would much rather have an 8 OC graded as a straight 7 instead? Is it the value you are worried about or typically do these straight number cards sell for more?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Irv,
You've got it a little wrong. If you had an 8(OC), it most likely would be a 6 or below based on centering, so would get a 5 or 6 if you ask for "No Qualifiers" during the submission. If it had centering that met 7 standards, it would have come back a 7 instead of an 8(OC). Most MK qualifiers cannot be removed. It is always at the discretion of PSA to approve or disagree with your request.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But going back to my original question, why do some ask for no qualifiers knowing full well they will get a 5 or 6 instead of an 8 OC? Is the 6-7 worth more or is it more desirable than an 8 OC? I don't understand why some would ask for no qualifiers?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I'm giving Roach's a B- for effort here | milkit1 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 23 | 06-22-2015 08:58 PM |
| Giving up the 57 set so who needs them | sfacujackcat | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 05-11-2013 09:10 PM |
| Wtb 1933 goudeys high psa grades with qualifiers | CMIZ5290 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-28-2010 05:24 PM |
| Giving up on Ebay? | Bridwell | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 03-20-2010 08:10 PM |
| Show Grades vs Mail Grades | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2008 09:34 PM |