![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If you sell cards on eBay, your cards will sell for whatever they sell for and we won't know if they actually achieved a certain price or if the buyer welched or if the seller shill bid on them, etc., etc. In other words, stop using eBay to make your point. Please. How about you buy the cards you want and stop telling us why we should "use" PSA? Bill |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I do point out on major cards at auctions (including ebay and other places) from time to time..to show what cards sold for in SGC and PSA holders...not sure how that's bad for the hobby to let people know..... I do buy SGC cards sometimes depending on the circumstances .. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 01-09-2016 at 11:14 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Bill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
why not make it a poll question.. as to if its the same exact card but one is in a SGC holder versus PSA...would the buyer pay more for the PSA , less or equal...I know I making an outrageous claim when I think more people will pick PSA but lets see.. by the way are you going to argue against my belief that the same exact card raw sells for less than if was a graded card with sgc or psa....or do I need evidence for that too.... if I don't need evidence for that then it proves we don't need evidence for things that are obvious...ie. things you lose credibility with if argue the opposite Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 01-09-2016 at 11:46 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In almost all cases PSA will outsell SGC. If the 1953 Mantle crosses to PSA it will sell for more. I have a friend who was looking for one he had a client at 50K on a PSA 8. Pretending SGC generally does not sell for less than PSA in most cases is just that pretending. The vast majority of full time graded card dealers use PSA and there is a reason for it. They sell for more money. SGC is generally a very fine company but this board sometimes advances some ideas about them that just are not true. I have heard some claim every SGC card would grade higher with PSA that is false I have heard some claim they are tougher on T206 I also feel that is false. Is SGC more consistent of course when you have had two vintage graders for almost 15 years that are the same, you are going to be more consistent. They also have less mistakes of course they do they've graded less than 10% of what PSA has graded. Again SGC is a fine alternative to PSA if you prefer their customer service or holders. Also their are some outlier issues where they may outsell PSA Old Judges come to mind but across the board issue for issue it is generally not close. So if you are a collector go with either one but if you want to maximize sales Id say 9 out of 10 times PSA will get you more money. Just because one prefers elements of SGC does not make their cards sell for more. PS I have bought cards from Kevin and found him to be knowledgable, honest, and very fair. For the record I would not have paid him what I did for the cards i purchased had they been in SGC and not PSA holders.
Pss From the looks of the scan I have no problem with the 8 grade as I think the chipping may be from the factory cut, at least it looks that way in the scans to me. Last edited by glynparson; 01-10-2016 at 05:57 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
also getting tired of people trying to hear people 'pretend' as you say that SGC cards sell for PSA prices on average............ I never seen a PSA listed card on ebay on the listing also put 'like an SGC'....but I see tons of SGC cards talk about being able to cross the card and put PSA?... Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 01-10-2016 at 07:16 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One thing missing from Glyn's and Jake's analysis is that the same card may well grade higher by SGC in this day and age where PSA is being extremely (and many would say overly) harsh particularly on postwar. For example I have some recent PSA 6s that for all the world look near mint to me and comparable to older (and not THAT much older) PSA 7s. So the apples to apples comparison may be (for example) PSA 6 to SGC 7 at least in some cases.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 01-10-2016 at 08:40 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 01-11-2016 at 10:46 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting reading, including that 11 pg link above.
Still not sure however, mainly due the current value of the CDN dollar and the fact I have to ship them, who I will use? $700.00, likely, for PSA to grade my Mantle doesn't sound too enticing, especially since (I believe?) I have a few more that might cost me that much as well? Disappointed there is no place in Canada (SGC or PSA) that grades cards but I understand that as likely there isn't a whole of money to be made up here compared to the U.S.? Thanks for the good read guys. ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This one takes it all....51 mantle SGC 84 goodwin | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-20-2013 07:45 PM |
Has anyone seen the 52 Mantle BVG 8 (Goodwin)? | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-19-2013 05:53 PM |
1970 topps super partial set 32/40 Mantle oddballs Post Mantle Holiday Inn PSA | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 12-02-2012 08:27 AM |
N162 Goodwin Champions Brouthers/Goodwin Auction* | BCD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-10-2011 06:35 PM |
For Sale- Mickey Mantle cards 1957 Topps, 1960 Topps, 1963 Topps, and 1966 Topps | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 02-01-2009 12:51 AM |