Can you trust any authenticated babe ruth ball?

[RichardSimon]

Originally Posted by btcarfagno

Ruth single signed balls are absolutely a mine field, especially ones in top condition.

There are certain long time dealers whose opinion you should absolutely value above those of the major authentication companies. Jim Stinson, Richard Simon, Richard Albersheim...there are others but those three off the top of my head I would trust with a single signed Ruth.

You need to be very careful with these, especially so for examples in top condition (not that they are "more forged" but rather because of the outlay and expense).

Tom C

Thanks for the kind words.
I have not owned a Babe Ruth baseball in a long time. Every owner of one sends it to an auction. It then goes to the TPA's and if you have read the HOS story you know what has been happening then.

[ooo-ribay]

The auction house/authenticator relationship is a little too cozy for me.

[pokerplyr80]

Thanks for the responses. This is the ball I am considering:

[RichardSimon]

Originally Posted by ooo-ribay

The auction house/authenticator relationship is a little too cozy for me.

++++
I have authenticated for three auction houses.
Two of them were easy to work with and never pressured me on items.
One of them was always looking over my shoulder and if I rejected an item they were all over it with "oh, we got this from so and so."

[Bpm0014]

Slightly atypical in that the U intersects with the R, but good. A pre-1928 autograph obviously.

[JMEnglish27]

Probably common knowledge, but is there a timeline on when he stopped putting Babe in quotes? Is that what you mean by pre-1928?

[Bpm0014]

Yes. He generally stopped using them in 1928.

[pokerplyr80]

Thanks for the input and information.