![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for everyone's feedback, I greatly appreciate it! The two photos in question are of Rube Foster and the 1936 East-West team photo. I haven't seen the back of the 1936 East West photo, but it looks like both items were previously consigned the Heritage Auctions 6 or so years ago.
Once I have the 1936 photo in hand, I will take a photo of the back and upload Thank you! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am almost certain the Foster is no good. Not sure on the other one would have to see it. No photographer would ever emboss a photo they were going to glue on a cabinet, they had embossed cabinets (plus it looks like the embossing is in the photo and not actually raised). Thin photo paper required a cabinet backing, embossing was for thick photo paper. You would rarely find that combination together, plus it looks modern and glued to an older mount with pencil inscription on the back done in older handwriting style to deceive. I would never give an absolute without holding it in person, but I would find this item to be very likely a modern creation.
Rhys
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com Last edited by prewarsports; 12-30-2015 at 07:44 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Both photos were indeed sold through Heritage previously, and have larger scans hosted on their site:
http://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/ci...umbnail-071515 http://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/19...umbnail-071515 To my eye, in looking at the larger scan of the Foster photo and per Heritage's description, the central photo is embossed. Mostly I'm just posting to point to the previous sales. I have no comment either way regarding mounting practices, but would not discount Rhys's opinion, as he has handled many many more mounted photos over the years than I have.
__________________
Ebay Store and Weekly Auctions Web Store with better selection and discounts Polite corrections for unidentified and misidentified photos appreciated. Rude corrections also appreciated, but less so. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Rhys and Lance! I should have the photos in hand next week and will be better able to tell if the Foster is embossed or not. I have seen several other similar Foster photos that Bedou embossed, (I guess he was a big time Afro-American photographer who did a lot of photographs of Booker T. Washington, etc.) but unsure if this is a copy or not.
I suppose it makes even more sense now to send these in to PSA regardless to get an answer once and for all. The authentication prices seem rather reasonable. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shipping 8x10 photos...what is the best way? Advice needed! | Golfcollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-15-2015 04:39 PM |
Is PSA really authenticating autographs? | travrosty | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 07-08-2013 05:06 PM |
Are they authenticating with NO exemplars now? | travrosty | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 11-09-2011 11:04 PM |
Best Way of Authenticating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-14-2008 09:48 PM |
"Identifying, Dating and Authenticating Photos" Resource Page | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-23-2004 12:23 PM |