![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a sweet 57 Mickey Bob, very nicley centered. Super hard to find a nice centered 57 mantle in any grade.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Conversations like this make me realize what a great value coins still are.
For the 10k-100k price of a 52 Topps Mantle with thousands still existing, you could get any number of rare gold coins with less than 100 still existing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You could also get a number of Mantle cards with fewer than 100 in existence, but they don't have the same universal appeal as a 52 Topps. If I told a non-collecting friend I owned a Pittsburgh Playing card of Mantle or some gold coin, they wouldn't know or care a bit. Most of my friends would be interested in seeing the 52 Topps though.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
its funny how people still talk about rareness versus demand...who cares if there is one of something if nobody wants it. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
There's plenty of rare coins which aren't popular either. That wasn't my point though. We're talking about blue chip items from cards and coins, not something that "nobody wants". In fact, there's not a gold coin in existence that "nobody wants". I'm just pointing out what an over priced, over hyped, poor "value" the 52 Topps is. As someone pointed out earlier in the thread, the 51 Bowman is a much better card for your money and is actually his rookie card, unlike the 52 Topps. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
when everyone else is digging for gold, sell shovels.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There have been a lot of things that have fooled a lot of people for a long time. Talking cards? OK, PSA 8 T206 Wagner and it still does!!!. A card that should be labeled as "A" (Authentic).
If someone were to offer me a choice of a 52 Topps Mantle (lets just say a well centered EX card) or an equivalent amount of gold bullion, and told me that whatever I choose I had to hold it for 10 years, I would take the gold bullion in a heartbeat. 99.99% of the rest of the world would do the same. Those silly fools ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And who are you to determine what's a "value" or "better" for another's money? I could buy a 52 Topps Mick today, and if I've gotten enjoyment and happiness for my money, that's "value" to me. It's also specious to pit his 51 against his 52 as if they're locked in some asinine competition. They are both fantastic baseball cards, and I'd venture the collector who likes one likes the other. Last edited by MattyC; 12-27-2015 at 03:39 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
It makes perfect sense to compare the two when half of the baseball card world thinks the 52 Topps is Mantle's rookie card. But, if we're just talking about random Mantle cards and not his rookie, heck, the 53 Bowman is a better card than the 52 Topps. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1952 Topps Mantle | ezez420 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 07-18-2014 01:20 PM |
F/S 1952 Topps to 1966 Topps - Low to mid grade vintage stars - Mantle Maris Mays | frankhardy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 11 | 07-27-2013 09:51 AM |
Mantle owned SGC 80 1952 Topps Mantle card | Doug | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 01-06-2012 12:29 PM |
FS: 1969 Topps Mantle, 1952 Topps Pafko, 1974 Topps Aaron | jb217676 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-05-2010 01:28 PM |
1952 Topps Mantle | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-23-2006 10:04 AM |