 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-02-2015, 05:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
2nd post and 2nd question: The attached picture is NOT of my '56 Mantle, but of a card out on eBay right now. Look closely at the top right corner of this card. Now tell me, is this not the same type of paper loss (worse, actually) than what appears on my card in the original post ?!?!?! I guess maybe SCG could detect my "tampering" (if indeed I used an eraser) whereas maybe this card got the paper loss more honestly?
What are your opinions (grading and dispicable card-tampering practices aside...) as to eye appeal and how these types of things affect them? Thanks.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mick | jimjim | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 08-08-2013 03:57 PM |
| Is this Mick or Mack | dogmechanic | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 08-07-2013 08:07 AM |
| Is this Mick good? | mcgwirecom | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 08-01-2013 07:00 PM |
| Joe, Mick and Ted | murphusa | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2013 01:02 PM |
| Joe D, Ted & Mick.. Need help | MGHPro | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 11 | 07-18-2012 07:55 PM |
Hybrid Mode
