NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

View Poll Results: What is the worst Set Topps produced in the 1950's
1952 3 2.63%
1953 4 3.51%
1954 6 5.26%
1955 1 0.88%
1956 5 4.39%
1957 10 8.77%
1958 50 43.86%
1959 35 30.70%
Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2015, 09:36 AM
Rookiemonster's Avatar
Rookiemonster Rookiemonster is offline
Dustin
Dustin Mar.ino
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nj
Posts: 1,451
Default 1957 1958

It's a tie for me but I guess I give a vote to 1957 . There no color , I find a lot of cards are blurry or off center . It also began the white borders for topps which is the worst now . The over did it and now it feels tired . It does have more star power then 58 on the upside of things
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2015, 04:32 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
John Collins
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,558
Default

I will join those in the minority and say that I feel '58 gets far less love than it should. I can see it getting the votes for worst simply because the competition was so stiff with so many good sets in the '50's, but I for one really like '58. Even though it was 30 years later, I apparently had a lot of them as a kid, including a white letter Aaron that is one of my all-time favorite cards. They may have been unimaginative, but they were colorful and in most cases pretty cards. (Most imaginative set of the '50s goes to 1955 Bowman, if my vote counts...) As for the condition issues, take your pick. The backgrounds on some '58's may look "dirty", but for as much praise as the '57's get on their color photography - their backgrounds are so often riddled with print issues and the "snow" problem - far more than the '58's are. While collecting today, I often appreciate that I can pickup '58 stars in some cases for far less than a '56 or '57 card of the same player would go for. Let's hear it for 1958 Topps!!!
__________________
T206 Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.

Last edited by jchcollins; 12-02-2015 at 04:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2015, 09:46 PM
kailes2872's Avatar
kailes2872 kailes2872 is offline
Kev1n @1les
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pittsburgh Area
Posts: 768
Default

It always felt like the late 50's were an evolution. 57 had photos, 58 had solid color, so 59 is s hybrid. It is like a 58 background with a circle cut out a 57 through the circle. These are the things that I think about as I am turning pages in the binders...


Similarly, 69 is like a hybrid of 67&68
__________________
2024 Collecting Goals:

53-55 Red Mans Complete Set

Last edited by kailes2872; 12-02-2015 at 09:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2015, 09:59 AM
Topps206's Avatar
Topps206 Topps206 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kailes2872 View Post
It always felt like the late 50's were an evolution. 57 had photos, 58 had solid color, so 59 is s hybrid. It is like a 58 background with a circle cut out a 57 through the circle. These are the things that I think about as I am turning pages in the binders...


Similarly, 69 is like a hybrid of 67&68
I guess I just noticed that since I enjoy the 1968 and 1969 sets while 1967 is far and away my least favorite set design of the decade. The one thing I'll always find intriguing is the mirror card of Larry Haney in the 1968/1969 sets.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vote - best Topps set Touch'EmAll Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 119 05-14-2018 09:10 AM
What was the last year Topps produced their cards in series? wilkiebaby11 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 6 05-21-2015 02:38 PM
2003 Topps Vintage Embossed ( 1961 #85 Gil Hodges ) One of Two Cards Produced DinoPro Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T 0 03-08-2015 01:15 PM
My vote for worst slab design Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 12-20-2005 10:39 PM
Vote for Worst Condition Card on EBAY Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 25 04-15-2004 10:54 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 PM.


ebay GSB