NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

View Poll Results: What is the worst Set Topps produced in the 1950's
1952 3 2.63%
1953 4 3.51%
1954 6 5.26%
1955 1 0.88%
1956 5 4.39%
1957 10 8.77%
1958 50 43.86%
1959 35 30.70%
Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2015, 02:06 PM
PolarBear's Avatar
PolarBear PolarBear is offline
Don
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 633
Default

I'm going to get labeled a heretic but I think the 52 set is Topps worst looking set of the 50's. The 59 would be a close second.

Also, I'm not sure why everyone hates the 58 set, it's one of my favorites. It has something of a 1914-15 Cracker Jack feel to it.

Back to the 52's. I realize it was a ground breaking set in 1952 but compared to the designs, artwork, and photography that followed, it just doesn't hold up. I think there's a lot of 52 bias and can't help but think if the 58 design was used in 1952, everyone would still be saying how great the 52's are.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2015, 02:32 PM
Topps206's Avatar
Topps206 Topps206 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 726
Default

I don't really care for the 1957 set, but none truly awful.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2015, 10:08 PM
mintacular's Avatar
mintacular mintacular is offline
Patrick N.
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,923
Default 55 set

I feel the 56 set is a nice sophisticated upgrade to the '55 and so I feel the '55 is just too basic and boring with too many headshots....
__________________
My First YouTube Video:
https://youtu.be/1nW2r1NgdOA
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:00 AM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,939
Default

57' for me no question, just a tad boring.

I can see people's thoughts on the 59', however the combo and sporting news cards are amazing and make the whole set. I have only a handful of star cards from the set, but collected every one of the combos and Sporting News.

Just for those, the 59's are in my top 4.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:40 AM
Topps206's Avatar
Topps206 Topps206 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 726
Default

1959 is unique. I like the concept of the circle around them. I could probably do without the lowercase names, but so be it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:06 PM
boneheadandrube's Avatar
boneheadandrube boneheadandrube is offline
Greg B.
Greg Bish.op
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topps206 View Post
1959 is unique. I like the concept of the circle around them. I could probably do without the lowercase names, but so be it.
the lower case lettering was a prediction of the future for the upcoming txt message series cards in the works at etopps

Last edited by boneheadandrube; 12-15-2015 at 06:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:33 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,393
Default 1951 Kostanty, Roberts and Stanky

Steve-- I would take those cards in that condition if you still have them. I fact, would pay a tidy sum

And Glyn-- which of the 5 51 sets ?

Last edited by ALR-bishop; 12-15-2015 at 06:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-15-2015, 10:51 PM
Volod Volod is offline
Steve
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NEOH
Posts: 1,110
Default

[quote=ALR-bishop;1482077]Steve-- I would take those cards in that condition if you still have them. I fact, would pay a tidy sum

Nah, Al - the general consensus being that the '51 sets are not only plug ugly, but too insignificant to enter into a discussion of Topps history, I would be embarrassed to offer them to you for actual legal tender. Besides, if i recall correctly, they all fell out of my bike spokes real fast - thin cardstock and die-cut, as they were.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-04-2015, 07:38 AM
tjenkins tjenkins is offline
Todd Jenkins
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Clark, South Dakota (rural)
Posts: 594
Default

I am partial to the 57 set as being the best and the 58 probably my least favorite but like most who have posted here, I really like all the 50 designs. I love the pure photo design of the 57s and I am not extremely fond of the 58 color backgrounds mainly because I have always liked to see photo backgrounds to see the stadiums, other players or fans in the background and the 57 (also the 67 and 73) set is great for that, it's just a better experience for me personally. I often times wonder if older collectors say, "Hey, that is me in the background, I was at that game!" The 57 Mantle "ghost card" where you can see the person Topps tried to airbrush out is a super cool card as is the reverse negative of Hank Aaron. The 58 basically had nothing but a solid color background. That's just my opinion but that is why we collect, right? We all have different likes!
__________________
Collect Vikings, Twins, Vintage HOF and also Off-Center vintage. ***A journey of a 1,000 miles begins with a single card! -Cardfusious

Mostly PC with some for trade page:

[https://www.flickr.com/photos/187700522@N03/

Recent positve trades with: Brian Van Horn, frank bmd, nkesterke09, ajg, esehombre, mrmantlecollector, KC Doughboy, gregr2,bn2cardz, sycks22

Last edited by tjenkins; 12-04-2015 at 09:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vote - best Topps set Touch'EmAll Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 119 05-14-2018 09:10 AM
What was the last year Topps produced their cards in series? wilkiebaby11 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 6 05-21-2015 02:38 PM
2003 Topps Vintage Embossed ( 1961 #85 Gil Hodges ) One of Two Cards Produced DinoPro Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T 0 03-08-2015 01:15 PM
My vote for worst slab design Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 12-20-2005 10:39 PM
Vote for Worst Condition Card on EBAY Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 25 04-15-2004 10:54 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM.


ebay GSB