![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Can confirm another Collins Yellow Elephant (Piedmont, Factory 25)
![]() ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Turner are they all Pied 25's. That's the only back confirmed unless I missed some.
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great research Andrew et al.....Thanks for sharing!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great Research. Based on your earlier discussions, I also did a deep dive on the series analysis. Although a longer response is needed, my first point would be to suggest removing the Shean and Graham from the initial list of SP's. I think it's easier to think in "classes" rather than SP/non SPs...while total populations may be similar, the 14 other sps are virtually identical in terms of back appearance and populations, whereas Shean and Graham are clearly different, though total populations might be similar.
For the record, in my categorization, I have Shean in Graham in the same class as players like Austin, Bates and Becker...it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on including Shean and Graham with that group. Mac |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think much of this research is spot on...I would only advise that just because a card is found with only three (or four backs) like Krause does not necessarily mean they are single prints. We know there were multiple printing in the same factory for the same back (the Hoblitzell and Moran variations confirm that). We also know that the print runs for different backs (Hindu vs. Piedmont 25) were vastly different. Overall, I think the research is great and does seem to jive with much of what I have seen...but that Krause list is not an SP list. When you start hoarding the set like I have, Krause, Schafer, Wallace white cap, are all pretty common and easy to find.
Just my opinion. Joshua |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great stuff about my favorite set. Keep up the good work. I'm drooling over that yellow elephant Collins.
__________________
Looking for affordable T205 Hoblitzell no stats; also any T206 Drum |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ciotte was confirmed by a friend of mine this morning. That makes 20 total confirmed Hindus!!
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Andrew - I noticed that you don't list the pink Walsh in your list of print variations. Do you consider that a true variation like the others, or more of a one-off error? I can't remember what the pop is on that card...has more than one been confirmed?
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My T206 Plank theory....New Follow-up info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 12-18-2020 12:14 PM |
T205 Question/Theory | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 01-07-2012 09:59 AM |
The enigmatic T206 350/460 series....theory, checklist & backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 02-11-2009 12:38 PM |
T205 info requested -- Part II: Rare backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-11-2006 07:01 PM |
Pseudo E95 blank backs; a bit more info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-09-2006 09:29 PM |