![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry to ask the obvious, but do the cards measure correctly? Otherwise, resubmit, and you may just have to take what grade given. Too bad, nice grades already...
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't measure them myself since they'd already been graded once.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That certainly is bad luck, unless you submitted another 500 cards with those 5. I know a lot of people crack out cards and resubmit as you did, but this is a good example of why I've always been afraid to.
I have had a card I sent in raw rejected for minsize. I guess it's a card that shows no signs of trimming but was miscut too short at the factory.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not real familiar with the grading game or companies but i just want to make sure i understand this.
1) You submitted an already numerically graded card by PSA (presumably hoping for a half grade bump?) 2) They received the card that they had previously graded and then claimed they could not holder the card because it did not meet their own minimum size requirements? Last edited by esehombre; 10-30-2015 at 10:10 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well different grader different results. Go to trial in court, different judge or jury different results. I always wonder why sellers say in ebay 'candidate for a bump, I may just send in myself' I never believe that because things like what happened to you can happen to them.
There is subjective eye appeal and can be a major difference of opinion, however you would think minimum size requirement is a very objective thing. They should give you an explanation. I have heard people resending cards several times so maybe you want to spin the wheel again...however I think PSA is pretty consistent these days so was surprised to see that if your story is true. at least they should take your previous grades from the POP I always felt POP was more real in the 8s and above category in cards from the 50s but maybe there are more ghost 7s than I realized.. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 10-30-2015 at 11:03 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The main question I had was did you submit the PSA cards still in the graded holders? I wouldn't expect PSA to take cards they had previously graded, remove them from the holder, and then declare they weren't able to grade them. Is that what happened, or were they submitted raw?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Measure them out and let us know the dimensions. If the cards measure out a bit small, no need to resubmit. Wasting money at that point.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! Last edited by KCRfan1; 10-31-2015 at 08:58 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-16-2014 08:58 PM |
Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 11-14-2014 03:36 PM |
My thoughts on these stupid grading posts | Kenny Cole | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 91 | 05-21-2010 11:47 PM |
Thoughts on grading | ptowncoug3012 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-30-2010 09:52 PM |
Opinion needed on grading this card???? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-02-2007 11:00 AM |