![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Re the "hobby is dying" part: ask yourselves this__ if prices started to rapidly fall on some of the holy grails, like the T206 Wagner, M101 and 1914 Baltimore News Ruth rookies, high-grade '52 Topps Mantles, etc, how many of us would line up to catch them if and when they got within our price range? Virtually all of us, I would think, which is the answer to the question itself: demand for the real classics, the material collectors thrive on, is like a large pyramid, with ledges. If the top or even several layers slough off, there's too much below it to keep it all from going, and the net result is that none of it would fall very far. We're here to stay now, boy, just as long as baseball and its history is popular. Anyone who thinks the hobby is dying should have been at the National this past July--BIG, BIG AGAIN, JUST LIKE IT WAS IN '92 in Atlanta (compared to small, like Cleveland, in 2009)! TONS OF YOUTHFUL ENERGY, BURSTING AT THE SEAMS WITH BARELY CONTAINED INTEREST IN PURSUING AND OBTAINING WHAT IT WANTED!
Plus, Leon hosted a helluva Net54 dinner on Friday. I highly recommend it for all for next year! We're all in this together, like family. No need for name-calling between brothers who simply sometimes disagree. May we all find joy in our collecting endeavors, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 10-27-2015 at 09:00 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree, if the prices are a dropping, I'm there picking up those cards as mentioned (the Balt Ruths, 52 Micks, t206s and more) for 50%off or whatever. Which i doubt ever happen in my lifetime.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
would a t206 green cobb be one of them? Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 10-28-2015 at 10:09 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let me know when the hobby dies; then I'll have plenty of shopping to do
![]() In all seriousness, in between set builders, type collectors, HOF collectors, tackling The Monster, players-from-my-home-town collectors, etc, there are enough niches to ensure the hobby never dies. There will be price corrections (I think we will see one WRT 1952 Topps Mantles), but there will always be a market for the kind of stuff we collect. ls7plus articulated what I'm getting at better than I am.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Collect what-ever you wanna collect, and sure Cobb is a great player to collect. Seems like your creating or wanting a list of cards that will retain value or such. If investing for the long haul is your motive, then maybe a IRA account is the path. I just collect, to just collect the players i like. Im not here to start a discussion on what-ifs or what the future holds.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that the only way for the hobby to truly die would be for the forgers to get so good that it would be impossible to tell the difference between real vintage cards and new copies.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they got so good no one could tell the difference who would know
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Happy collecting, Larry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I do not think they are coming up with 100s of cards in the ETC.......I think its less than 50.....and again if there is difference on opinion on some cards..then maybe those aren't rock solid...like everyone agrees 1933 Ruth? I got a feeling in those 100s of cards you are talking about there will not be the same agreement as there is on a 1933 ruth as there will be on all those 100s of cards you are talking about Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 10-29-2015 at 09:26 AM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Or, if you like, study what has occurred in the area of collectible automobiles. Carrol Shelby's five Cobra Daytona Coupes, raced at Le Mans, could have been had--all of them, total--for $12,000 in the late '60's. Now, each and every one of them is valued in the seven figure range. And that certainly is not an isolated example. The early '60's Ferrari GT 250 is a $30-$40 million dollar car all day long, every day, at any significant auction. And people don't drive them--they're too valuable. They are simply collectibles like the one's we pursue. Another example? Take the 1967 Chevrolet Corvettes with the 427 cubic inch, 435 horsepower motor. They made a fair amount of them, but from the time it could be purchased in the '80's for $6,000 or so it continued to rise in value until now, the best condition examples command $150 to $200K. It simply became the one to have for many a serious collector. A 1971 LS 6 Corvette (454 motor, 425 horsepower), of which GM made 188, could have been had in the $8,000 range in 1979 (I know--I was offered one that was in tremendous condition then, but somehow turned it down when I could have bought it--darn!!!) is now $150,000. 1971 Hemi convertibles--a terrible car--nose heavy, and prone to shimmying and shaking, as it lacked the rigidity of a coupe, is now a $3 million dollar car. Why? They made just 12 of them, and while all '64-71 Hemi's are quite valuable, the '71 convertible Cuda is King because it is the one to have. 1969-70 Boss 429 Mustangs (something like 1,000 to 2,000 made over those two years) is a quarter of a million dollar car. I rode in a friend of mine's in the '80's, which he bought as an investment somewhere in the $12 to $17K range. All of the above represent just a very few of the examples I could have cited, if someone was willing to pay me for my time to do so. They are merely illustrative of the many such items out there. Objects of history, significant in their own field, become valuable BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE THEM, AND THEY'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO LIKE THEM! Prices have risen to the stars on some of the most desirable items because collectors just like us, but with a net worth of many, many millions of $$$ have been drawn to the hobby too. As I said earlier, demand for true collector's items is like a pyramid, but with ledges--the higher the value of any given item, the taller the pyramid. While it is most definitely true that as prices on a given item progress to the stratosphere, the rate of appreciation slows down (I have tracked it in coins and cars), the item's value can't fall very far in the absence of some enormous catastrophic event, because if the highest level of demand, i.e. the collectors willing and able to pay some of these Mt. Everest prices, falls away, the next lower level is still there, still wants the item, and is willing to pay the price within their means. Also, think outside the box. A '33 Ruth's potential in middle grade is limited because there is no real shortage of them. Compare its value in VG/Ex or Ex to the recent sale of a 1921 Holsum Bread Ruth in VG, with only one presently having been graded by all TPG's combined--a cool $83,000. It's significance is that its Ruth (and 1921 was also both Ruth's best year, and the year of the Yankees first pennant, to the discerning collector), and it at least appears to be magnificently rare! Interestingly, the 1914 Baltimore News Ruth, certainly not then a "mainstream" card, came out of the chute, so to speak, at the Copeland auction, circa 1991. The price then? $6,000. I'll take two. The question, if you're concerned with value is: what are the big boys going to want that I can get now before the former even know they are going to want it? They don't buy for investment; they buy the best because they want the best! An E-107 Honus Wagner could have been had in 1995 (if you could find one) in the low 4-figure range. One subsequently sold for $136,000 when the E-107 rage was at its peak. As I've also said, we're here to stay, just as long as baseball and its history, or, if you are a type collector, the history of baseball cards, remains popular. Just my 95 bucks worth, and wish you well in your collecting endeavors, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 10-29-2015 at 05:48 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
there are hundreds of 52 mantles out there...I not think in any of your examples involved an item where there were 500-1000 of them.... but you make good points.... Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 10-29-2015 at 05:54 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the hobby can still be fun. | Centauri | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 14 | 02-26-2015 12:58 PM |
Hobby Newsflash! Re: Top 250 Cards In Hobby | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-17-2014 04:08 PM |
When It Was A Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-06-2005 10:17 AM |
When it was a hobby . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-01-2005 07:15 PM |
How low can this hobby get? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-24-2002 01:09 PM |