![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For 1914 you're looking at the following in 1-2 grades:
Alexander $1250-$1500+ Cobb $3000-$7500 Jackson $7500-$15,000 Wagner $3000-$5,000 Mathewson $10,000-$20,000
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
any ideas on 1915's?
__________________
my 1952 topps set less than 60 to go!!! also looking for psa 3-6 1954 topps hockey looking for 1952 topps high series commons |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bump
__________________
my 1952 topps set less than 60 to go!!! also looking for psa 3-6 1954 topps hockey looking for 1952 topps high series commons |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure on the '15s but it seems the '14s have come down a little lately. My wild ass guess on the 15s is a bit more than half the value of the '14s. Some google searches will give you the specific results.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I got a PSA 3 one this one and I'm puzzled as to why. Was the impression on the left side severe enough to knock it down that far? Perusing the grades on Ebay I was expecting a 4 or maybe even a 4.5. I'd appreciate any even input, even if it's "John, your full of s***, you were lucky to score a 3 on that one" .
__________________
My website... http://johnswisports.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm certain that CJ grades have gotten much stricter in the last 2 years at PSA. What would be a 5 is now getting 3 or lower in some cases. One contributing factor seems to be that caramel staining is more closely scrutinized. On your card, the crease on the left definitely plays into the 3 as well as the staining. But to be honest I've seen that same condition and worse in 4's and 5's. Because of the wildly fluctuating grading in this set, unless you're playing the GPA registry game, buying the card vs the grade is crucial.
The grading variance is also one reason I think the pop reports for this set is off by as much as 25% with collectors cracking and resubmitting. p.s. that's a very tough card in the set and one you don't see come up for sale often. It's a beauty!
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 12-03-2015 at 11:52 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for the responses. I was actually able to get the customer service rep to talk to the head grader at PSA. His response was the 3 resulted from the staining. I just guess it would have been nice if they had decided how they would treat the staining on these cards from the outset and stuck with it.
![]()
__________________
My website... http://johnswisports.com Last edited by effe; 12-03-2015 at 12:23 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
prices for..1914-1915 cracker jacks...wrong section sorry...moved | benderbroeth | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 10-17-2015 07:13 PM |
Trading 1914 Cracker Jacks for 1914/1915 CJ | ecRich | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 07-12-2014 08:03 PM |
FS: 1914 and 1915 Cracker Jacks | SMPEP | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 07-30-2012 03:11 PM |
1914 & 1915 Cracker jacks | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 07-16-2008 10:23 PM |
1914 vs 1915 Cracker Jacks? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-01-2005 07:15 PM |