![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not a baseball team at all.
Only eight players and a mascot/batboy. ![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Note that the uniform style is 1890s - early 1900s. The gloves seem consistent with that. This all would be at least very uncommon for c1919, unless they were really old hand-me-downs. The postcard could of course been produced at a later date.
Last edited by bmarlowe1; 10-05-2015 at 11:25 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Agree. Solely saying circa 1919ish based on the reverse...but with the divided back could be as early as 1907....either way makes sense with you dating the uniforms 1890's to early 1900's...I would venture likely some sort of hand me downs.... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If it's real photo (no dots in image), it's an early 1900s cyanotype real photo postcard. Cyanotype was a photo processes known for its blue (cyan) image and was used to make some real photo postcards and snapshots. Baseball cyanotypes are scarce but not rare. The uniforms are early, so the date would be close to the 1907 divided back starting date.
Last edited by drcy; 10-05-2015 at 12:13 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doubtful to be the Tacoma team, they only played two seasons 1923 & 1924. Here's an image of Babe Ruth & Bob Meusel in Tacoma playing an all-star aggregate from the Tacoma Industrial League. No members of the 1924 Skidoos on the team:
http://digitum.washingtonhistory.org...nd/id/27/rec/1 Way too many references to the popular phrase to narrow it down. With only eight players as Frank noted ![]() https://books.google.com/books?id=CZ...seball&f=false Last edited by pariah1107; 10-05-2015 at 12:22 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's a Cyanotype most likely produced between 1905 and 1910 . I agree the image could be from an earlier photo .
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow! Great info, all! Thanks!
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Maybe it is my great great grandfather!
__________________
Tanner Jones - Author, Confessions of a Baseball Card Addict - Available on Amazon www.TanManBaseballFan.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That image is not from 1910 to 20 S. It is from the 1890 s lace up front gloves add up to that time period.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just to add credence to the earlier dates:
Regarding usage of the phrase 23 skiddoo: "its heyday was really the first decade of the century; by the 1920s it was already rather passé." http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-twe2.htm |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help identifying these please | prestigecollectibles | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 11-17-2013 10:03 PM |
Need some help identifying what these are ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-14-2008 08:24 PM |
need help identifying these | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 10-22-2007 08:34 PM |
Need Help Identifying........... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-26-2006 08:53 PM |
need help identifying this | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-17-2006 10:33 AM |