 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-18-2015, 08:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I don't see anything from the scan of the front that makes me think something is wrong; may be worth a crack and resubmit. I would not send it in for review currently as a 5.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
#2
08-18-2015, 08:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd definitely crack it if I were to resubmit. But that's the game that I hate playing. Paying for two submissions for someone to tell me how a card looks. The PSA 10 payoff was just too tempting on this one and this grade really backfired on me.
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running online collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
|
|
#3
08-18-2015, 09:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
how much are you selling it for?
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
|
|
#4
08-19-2015, 06:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
PM sent
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running online collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
|
|
#5
08-19-2015, 12:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is brutal. You have my sympathies. '93 Topps Jeters tend to have issues with the dark green background but even that looks flawless. I wonder what they saw, if anything to knock it down to a 5.
I have one of these lined up for my next submission and now I'm terrified. 
|
|
#6
08-19-2015, 12:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought this was the better of the two I submitted and the other one got a 9. I'm pretty much at a loss as to where this grade came from.
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running online collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
