|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Al, To be honest, collecting 1955 Topps would probably make more sense for many reasons (prices, great rookies, smaller #). I definitely considered that possibility. I always come back to the 52's. As a kid, the 1952 set just seemed mythical and unattainable to me. I have always enjoyed history, and reading about the 1952 set when I was young established it in my mind as "the set". Trust me, I have often tried to talk myself out of it. In fact, this is the third time I have begun the 1952 set. The other two times I sold the cards I had, except for my HOFers. No matter what, I keep coming back to these cards. I guess I am just fascinated with the set, even with all of it's flaws (pricey, lots of no-names and coaches). Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Happy Collecting Ed |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Congrats on the 65 set completion. 65 is a great set.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Congrats Ed. What an accomplishment. Just curious as to your impression of how dififcult it was to obtain the hi nums versus another set like the 67's...
Z |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is the only 60's set I have completed so I don't have personal experience with the high #s from other set.s. For my 65 set, I didn't find the high #s terribly difficult. The toughest I recall were Mel Stottlemyre, Bob Uecker, and Jesus Alou. Most high # commons were readily available in the $3-6 range for VG-EX. Many of the hi # rookie cards were a little tough to find at a good price. There is a good crop of rookies in the 65 set. I had to especially be patient with the Steve Carlton, Catfish Hunter, Tony Perez and Tug McGraw rookie cards. From what I have read about the 1967's, the 1965 high numbers are definitely easier. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Happy Collecting Ed |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Congrats, Ed. '65 is a beautiful set, I love the Yaz in that set.
I'm getting pretty close to the completion of the '57 set...I highly recommend that one!
__________________
Working on the 1957 Topps set. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Andrew. The 1957 set is one of my favorites. Love the scenes of the old ballparks in the background of many of the cards.
__________________
Happy Collecting Ed |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great job completing the set! I love the way the Cardinals cards look in this set too. Good luck with the 52 Topps!
Scott |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
(Not counting the '68's and '69's; been so long since I completed those I can't really compare.) We now return you to your regular thread :-) Tom
__________________
Tom Housley Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club. www.oldbaseball.com |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well ok, Tom, we we will look the other way this one time
![]() Appreciate the observations |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1965 Topps - What is Your Favorite Card? | Samsdaddy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 24 | 12-24-2014 05:10 PM |
| 1965 Topps 26-card lot G-VG | PM770 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 4 | 07-20-2014 10:41 AM |
| FS: 1965 Topps Football 39 Card Lot SOLD | quinnsryche | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 3 | 02-18-2014 06:54 AM |
| 1965 topps Harmon Killebrew Auto card | bigfish | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-24-2010 07:08 PM |
| FS: 1965 Topps EX / EX-MT group of 77 raw cards - B. Robby, etc. - $1.50 per card | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-22-2008 10:01 AM |