![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If SGC was smart they'd rebrand their registry by allowing other TPG holders so that collectors with mixed sets could register all their cards in one spot.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
in addition...to protect from fraud I wonder why they don't allow registered owners to be contacted by prospective buyers of a card (in a way to protect privacy ) to see if the card they are bidding on is real...example..you see a cert verified 1952 mantle psa 4...and would like to bid on it..wouldn't it be nice to have an email sent to the person that owns that card who can advise if his card is really on ebay..? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would love to send a T206 to BGS just to see the confusion on the graders face
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As for the debate about SGC vs PSA. If it is a registry card then PSA has the dominance. If it isn't then not so much.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-19-2015 at 06:21 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to be an SGC guy, but 2 years ago I pointed out on thier POP reports they have cards errors and sets mixed together and they didn't care to correct. It is impossible to sort many of their sets on the POP report as well. Then....I submitted 2 cards for autograph authentication, both of which I got signed personally and they came back and wouldn't authenticate. Thier lack of ability to authenticate autographs also hurts the brand in my eyes. Also, given they are so much smaller of a company, they are one or two guys away from not being able to continue the business. I do not see a long-term succession plan for those folks who are grading.
In conclusion, I still buy some SGC cards but I'll send my raw cards to PSA as I've lost some confidence in SGC and I would urge no one to use or buy cards from their autograph authentication service. Cory Weiser |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One of the primary issues that is driving the spread is market share. Collectors Universe is obviously a publicly traded company and has to report various metrics and one of those is market share.
Last year in one of their quarterly reports they indicated that they have 90% of the new card submission market. SGC has 1 or 2 points of market share for all cards being graded currently. Take position bias out of the discussion and if you are in an industry where another competitor is this much larger you aren't even considered relevant. I have used SGC once and their customer service was great and I was pleased with the grading accuracy and presentation in the holder. That said I have no illusions that those cards will ever sell for what they would in comparable grades in a PSA holder. PSA is the 800 pound gorilla at this point and the values have followed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scary | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-04-2011 10:50 AM |
Looked Very Scary to me... | Northviewcats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-28-2011 12:37 PM |
SGC problem - Scary for me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 01-14-2008 08:08 AM |
Pretty scary.................. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-23-2006 03:30 PM |
this is scary | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-02-2005 01:38 PM |