|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why would someone trying to get a better grade send in the old cert.? In that case why not just submit for a bump?
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Either reason: sending to SGC and want an "unbiased" grade, or sending back to PSA but would rather crack out and try again then send back in for review.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
So why return the certs, especially in the second case where it just telegraphs that the card already has been graded whatever it was graded?
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
To keep the population low. They could wait until after the cards are re-graded to return the certs. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Edited to add: I don't think anyone is sending in the flip with the card to get regraded. You can send the flips back at any time and they'll know to adjust the pop report accordingly. Last edited by ergoism; 07-06-2015 at 11:08 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
When were the lower grades offered and what was the final hammer price on them? if anyone has that info, thanks.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can't see the 'send in the flips' crowd out there. Explain how if this Cobb gets a 9 why anyone would want to send in a flip that was a 6 or an 8. I understand the 'keep the Pop report right' scenario, but isn't it to the high grade crowd's favor to have MORE lower graded cards in the Pop report--right or wrong--than to be sure it's 'right'. The more cards at a lower level, the more impact that saying '1 of 1' or '1 of 2' really gets. I can't believe many people send in flips after cracking and resubmitting.....
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Stain removal from cards seems like such a gray area. If you showed me a nice 52 Mantle at auction then showed me an earlier picture of the card that showed tape stains, I'd still have the same level of interest in the card. However, if I saw a picture of the card and saw that it was recolored, re-backed, or had corners or edges rebuilt, then I'd have a problem as it would then be someone else's creation.
If it was a chemical process that could lead to long term damage of the card, I'd be worried. But from what I understand, the process isn't harmful to cards. If someone wants to take the Mantle in this PWCC listing and remove the stains then sell me the card a few grades higher, I truly wouldn't mind. I understand everyone has their own opinions on this and some view it as taboo since there is no disclosure in most cases. I'm a big fan of 80s Fleer basketball cards. If I open a wax box and decide to grade a few stickers, before I sell do I need to let someone know that these cards came with wax stuck on them and I had to take it off with panty hose? SCD did a very informative interview with stain remover Dick Towle that sheds some light on the process. It's worth a read: http://www.sportscollectorsdigest.co...res/nerattowle |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS 51 Cards 1970 Topps All High Numbers High Grade! | Northviewcats | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-12-2014 02:53 PM |
| 1956 Mickey Mantle PSA 7 Rare HIGH END HIGH Grade | CollectiblesNJ | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 49 | 07-18-2013 02:31 PM |
| For Trade My High Grade T206s for Your High Grade Cobb Portraits | RGold | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 11-28-2012 07:37 PM |
| Mile High- T 209 Set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-02-2008 02:13 PM |
| High-grade E93s Wanted | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2006 09:22 AM |