![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As you look through the cropping pictures go back and forth, notice the height of the checklist boxes relative to the card numbers. All part of the cropping differences.
I have never seen a variation in the first series 1972 CL, card #4. I suspect it is because it was part of a 132 card series. The first series did include the 2nd series checklist but the 1st CL was not double printed. Ditto for the 1973 BB set of 660--five series of 132. The decision by Topps to not double print the first series or show a preview CL of the next series was followed shortly by a shift to a full release of cards vs series by series. Whether or not that started in 1974 or 1973 has been oft debated here. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for chipping in Carlton
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's very interesting about the '72 CL, and seems to make perfect sense. The layout of that particular checklist is so basic, with hardly anything going on except a straight list of names (no copyright appearing, etc.), that it would be pretty easy to spot a variation if one did exist.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice. Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 1970 Topps #9 checklist card is most likely single printed also as it seems to command a premium over other 70 Topps checklist cards.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is single printed. Series of 132.
Larry, do you see a premium for the 1972 1st series CL? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ironically Carlton, I do not see any premiums for the 72 #4 checklist card....I do see premiums for all of the 73, 74 and 75 checklists(as they were all single printed).
With most of the 73 checklists typically carrying premiums (over the DP checklists from previous issues), this would further help to establish the fact that the 73 set was printed in single printing as the subsequent future sets were (although some collectors contend that the 73's were still distributed by series in some places). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All 73 CLs came in series of 132 so all were SPs.
The 73s were definitely sold by series. I have tons of the first 3 series and had to order a couple of 4th and 5th series from Larry Fritsch in early 1974 to fill out two sets. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1967 Topps Baseball #500 Marichal variation | variation-man | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 08-20-2014 07:47 PM |
1967 Phillies Rookies Variation | Gr8Beldini | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 10-03-2013 03:16 PM |
New Minor 1967 Variation | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-22-2013 02:11 PM |
1967 Master Reference File of Packard Bell's 1967 sponsorship of the L.A. Dodgers | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 05-25-2008 04:46 PM |
1967 Master Reference File of Packard Bell's 1967 sponsorship of the L.A. Dodgers | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 05-25-2008 04:44 PM |