![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Piedmont Factory 42s are TOUGH. I was fortunate enough to have been the publisher of Collector magazine, so at the time (the Spring of 2007) I had access to the raw data that Joshua Levine put together, as well as the article written by Shawn Adkins. It was a pretty massive undertaking; more than 20,000 backs had been catalogued at that point, and I know that Joshua continued long after the article was published.
Anyway, at the time, the breakdown of backs by percentage in their database looked like this: Piedmont Factory 25: 37.25% Polar Bear: 12.06% Honest Long Cut: 8.8% Sovereign: 8.45% Sweet Cap Factory 42 (red): 7.44% Hassan Factory 649: 6.84% Hassan Factory 30: 4.95% Sweet Cap Factory 25 (black): 4.22% Sweet Cap Factory 42 (black): 4.15% Cycle: 2.78% Piedmont Factory 42: .96% American Beauty (Green): .77% American Beauty (Black): .69% Broadleaf (green): .19% Hindu: .17% Broadleaf (black): .14% Drum: .14% The things that struck me about this breakdown were the plentiful nature of the Polar Bear and Sovereign backs, especially in comparison with T206, as well as the scarcity of the American Beauty backs. Anyway, I'm sure that over time some of these numbers have changed a bit; I understand that the population of AB Greens have increased with some finds, and that the population of Cycles may be off because a couple of guys with big collections of them weren't part of this project, but I think with this list you can get an idea of how most of these backs relate to one another in terms of overall scarcity, and can see that the Piedmont 42s are not given the credit they deserve. -Al |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've been starting to collect the Factory 42's over the past few months. I enjoy the scavenger hunt nature in the e-bay listings looking for a stray unrecognized 42. I've picked up about 10 of them including a Matty, Tinker, Chance and Bender. They are few and far between.
Paul |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks guys. Al, that list is extremely helpful and is what I was hoping to see here, thank you for posting it.
I find it interesting how big a difference the back makes in T206 and many other sets while seeming to be less important in T205. I guess perhaps the impact of the ad back is proportional to the size of the ad and therefore the smaller ads on T205 make people care about them a little less? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My T205 update | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-16-2014 09:53 AM |
T205 Update! | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-14-2013 07:40 PM |
Piedmont Tobacco Print - UPDATE | John V | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 06-13-2013 09:54 AM |
T205 update set | bbcard1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-15-2010 08:52 PM |
T206 PIEDMONT 460 Factory 42....update & survey | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 12-12-2008 01:42 PM |