T206 Who should be a HOFer that isn't ???

[z28jd]

Originally Posted by Joshchisox08

Interesting approach on the question ......... Wasn't expecting that one.

And it assumes that they have known what they are doing all this time too. That's a very interesting take since there are clearly plenty of strong candidates from the 1800's as well

[Econteachert205]

Originally Posted by z28jd

And it assumes that they have known what they are doing all this time too. That's a very interesting take since there are clearly plenty of strong candidates from the 1800's as well

Agreed. Tony mullane for one.

[Yoda]

Originally Posted by z28jd

And it assumes that they have known what they are doing all this time too. That's a very interesting take since there are clearly plenty of strong candidates from the 1800's as well

Like Jimmy Ryan and Tip O'Neil, who has been enshrined in the Canadian Sports Hall of Fame for many years.

[Topps206]

Originally Posted by Yoda

Like Jimmy Ryan and Tip O'Neil, who has been enshrined in the Canadian Sports Hall of Fame for many years.

Some compare Ryan to Magee. In my opinion, the latter was vastly superior.

What I do have a hard time is Babe Adams, Deacon Philippe and Sam Lever. What should be the pecking order in terms of HOF worthiness?

[JohnP0621]

Chief Meyers