![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scot--interesting card, thanks for posting it. My short answer is that I do not believe that it is a new pose. I think, for some reason, the ball is light/faded on your card. I think I can see vestiges of it on your scan, but I can't be sure. Typically, ball in/ball out poses are a result of cropping differences, not attempts to eliminate the ball from the field of view.
Some have asked why ball in/ball out differences are classified as new poses at all. After all, they are from the same negative. The reason we classified them as such relate to batting poses. A pose where a player is pictured with the bat in a hitting position, with no ball visible, is denoted as "Bat at ready" in the pose description. A batting pose with the ball visible is denoted as "Strike" in the pose description. Because of this difference in language, we thought it necessary to classify ball in/ball out batting poses as different poses, even if they were from the same negative. For consistence, we extended this to catching poses. Grass in/grass out has no similar description difference, and therefore doesn't need separate pose listings (thank goodness). Without speaking for Joe, I think neither he nor I love the ball in/ball out additional poses. However, by this point, most have been found so there is little need for further adjustments. As for eliminating them, no need at this point to try to put the genie back into the bottle. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
Thanks for the clarifying post. N172 is fascinating for sure. Even within the "same" pose there seems to be considerable variation -- Team X v. Team Y, plate v. no plate, grass v. no grass, etc. Speaking for myself, the Denver group is particularly fascinating since several of the poses come in many different flavors. For example, some can be found with the handwritten "Denver" with the backwards "N" in addition to with/without nameplate. Also, there were several attempts to scratch out "Milwaukee" (with varying success) on Klusman's uniform in some of his poses. Scot Last edited by sreader3; 05-30-2015 at 04:22 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scot--No more complicated, and for me interesting, set has ever been produced. It's over 125 years since the Goodwin started issuing these cards, and we are still learning more about the set, still discovering new poses. It's not a set to be conquered, it's a set to be studied and enjoyed.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS/FT: N172 Thompson (key HOF pose) | darwinbulldog | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-22-2014 07:13 AM |
1887 (1888) N172 Old Judge Ed Silch graded PSA Low Pop Only 2 Throw R/Hand High | bryanshaw | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-25-2013 07:09 AM |
N172 Catcher Pose - Krieg - SOLD - | DixieBaseball | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-18-2012 08:22 PM |
FS: N172 Pud Galvin 177-1b batting pose | gfgcom | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-28-2010 11:49 AM |
N172 Silch Denvers | bigfish | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-26-2009 04:32 PM |