T206 Detective Work

[atx840]

Progress!

The 4&5 groups should be one large 34 group and on all but the P42s we find those 34 cards always together. Oddly the P42s don't have any from the 21 group so I've had to divide it up.

I think the 6 super prints and your 12 were combined with any 28 group to make 34. Also all 12 could have been subbed in for others in the 28 group. It's also possible entire columns were the Exclusive 12s combined.

The pop report would help determine which are less frequent.


Erick your breakdown is very similar to what I've been working on. Keep breaking down the subsets into the smallest common denominator of groups. I've limited it to series as its pretty messy for the entire set.

[t206hound]

Originally Posted by atx840

Progress!
Why are the P42s missing the group of 21, how do we get a significant more Exclusive 12s in AB460, SOV460s & RH, did a group of 28+Exclusives get mixed in when printing the UZITS. This is what keeps me up at night .

Based solely on observation while attempting to put together the Sweet Caporal 460 Factory 42 subset (only need two), you can include SC460-42 in the group where there are signicantly more E12s.

[tedzan]

Hey good buddy, I'm still confused....are you saying that the Exclusive 12 were printed on the same sheet as the other 34 (or 35) subjects ?
If so, I have a serious difference with you.

The following is my theoretical timeline (based on American Litho. ledger notes) for the Exclusive 12 subjects printed on a sheet exclusively
of their own with......

Late 1910-Jan 1911

SC 460/42
Red HINDU

Jan-Feb 1911

AB 460
UZIT

Mar 1911

NOT PRINTED with LENOX, or PIEDMONT 460/42 (as other T206's were)



Exclusive 12 subjects with SWEET CAPORAL 460, Factory 42 backs......






.



TED Z
.

[Drew]

Thanks
Great Info
drew